RESEARCH TOPIC:
Topic: Impact of Internal Savings and Lending Schemes on poverty
reduction in Gokwe South, Zimbabwe. [BY TAPIWA M. GUDZA IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF
THE MASTERS DEGREE IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES]
1.0
Introduction
This study examines the impact of Internal Savings and Lending Schemes in
Gokwe South. The research is motivated by the need to understand whether ISALs
provide avenues for the poor and the poorest to meet their basic needs. The
study examines whether the schemes incorporate the very poor. Most studies have
generalized ISALs as a programme that has positive impacts on the poor but
there has been a gap in terms of distinguishing various categories of the poor.
Some scholars have argued that female headed households are the poor of the
poorest however ZIMSTAT statistics paints a different picture which shows that
generally male headed households experienced extreme poverty than their
counterparts (ZIMSTAT 2013). Gokwe South has been chosen as an area of study
since few researches has covered ISALs in the area. The inquiry will use
methodological and data triangulation to evaluate the extent ISALs can be used
as tool of poverty reduction.
Poverty brings
untold suffering to human kind, ridicules dignity and shortens life.
Governments and Non Governmental organization have designed and redesigned
programmes to put an end to poverty with varying degrees of success. Poverty
still remains one of the greatest challenges to human kind. The challenge of
studying poverty emanates from the nature and complexity and diversity of
poverty. Poverty is multi faceted, according to Iiffe (1987) the challenge with
studying poverty is that the poor themselves are not a homogeneous group, they
are diverse. People living in poverty invariably lack adequate and secure
livelihoods. They are vulnerable to HIV and AIDS, dangerous and illegal work
such as prostitution, child labour and exploitative working conditions below
the minimum wage. According to UNDP ( 2014) poverty is not mere absence of
adequate income, but it is a cruel mix of human deprivation in knowledge,
health, dignity and participation and lack of voice. The most notable thing is
that the poor lack access to loans and savings which can give them an
opportunity to engage in self employment and economic development through
various income and generating activities. Poverty is a multidimensional with
complex linkages and various strategies have been used to mitigate it. Internal
Savings and Lending Schemes (ISALs) is one of the approaches that have been
adopted to provide financial access to the poor. With most NGOs and Government
moving away from giving grants and loans ISALS have become a source of funding
for the poor. However in Zimbabwe, ISALS have also been used by those in the
middle class like civil servants to fund various initiatives.
Background to the study
According to Allen (2002) ISALs methodology was introduced in Zimbabwe in
1999 by Care International under the name Kupfuma Ishungu. A non – political
and non- sectarian humanitarian organization dedicated to fight against global poverty
which was founded in 1945 to bring emergencies relief to those who had survived
in World War 2 in Europe and East Asia (Brannen 2010). ISALs were a
modification of Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAS). In ROSCAS
contributions are fixed and the cycle ends when each member gets a turn to get
the contribution but in ISALS the members borrow the contributions and returns
the amount with an agreed interest and at the end of the cycle the members
share all the savings. ISALS are also characterized by a social fund which
members can borrow without interest in emergencies such as health, death, and
education of household members and productive loans repaid with interests
(Development Officer Training Guide 2010: 42). ISALS have been incorporated in
various programmes such as water and sanitation, HIV and AIDS and girl child
empowerment. The funding methodology has been replicated by various
organizations in Zimbabwe like Concern, Caritas, World Vision and Welt Hunger
Hiife with varying approaches. Ministry of Women Affairs, Gender and Community
Development has also taken the mandate to train ISALs. Though ISALs are popular
in Zimbabwe there is a sizeable number of people who are still using ROSCAs as
a funding methodology. While ISALs are more common in the rural areas there has
been assimilation of the programme into urban areas.
Microfinance institutions provide an alternative source of credit to the
‘poor’ however the demand of collateral security, salaried employment, guarantors,
and businesses is restrictive for the rural poor (Qureshi, Saleem and Ali
2012). ISALs seem to be better option to meet the funding needs of the
communities. Despite the attractive nature of ISALs there is a need to examine
to what extent they have been able to poverty reduction tool and the extent
they meet the needs of the poorest people. While poverty can be explained in
terms of basic needs theory it is important to evaluate ISALs contribution in
such a manner.
Statement of the Problem
The Government, Non Government
Organizations and donor agencies have tried to establish viable and accessible
financial inclusive systems in rural areas to eradicate poverty. .According
Peachey and Roe (2006) access to finance indeed empowers people, provides them
the opportunity to have an account, to save and invest, to insure their homes
or to take a loan and in many cases to liberate from the clutches of poverty.
The assumption of such microfinance intervention and initiatives is that it
will improve lives. It is in this context that ISALs have been a funding
methodology which has been used to fight poverty, it is imperative to
investigate the impact it has on mitigating poverty. The problem which this
study tries to address is providing access to finance for the poor so that they
can create self –employment and meet other business and financial needs. Henceforth
there is a need to examine whether ISALS are accessible to the poorest. The
problem can be summarized the statement by Koffi Annan former Secretary General
of United Nations ‘The stark reality
is that most poor people in the world still lack access to sustainable
financial services, whether it is savings, credit or insurance. The great
challenge before us is to address the constraints that exclude people from full
participation in the financial sector.… Together, we can and must build
inclusive financial sectors that help people improve their lives’ (Leticia
2012:12).
Justification
The research is important in that it will shade light on the impact of
ISALs on poverty eradication. The study can be used by policy makers,
evaluation departments and Non Government in designing and modifying ISALs to
ensure that these reach the poorest. Important lessons can be drawn from the
research to address the short falls of ISALs as microfinance strategy to ensure
financial accessibility and as poverty reduction tool.
There is need to fill the dearth of research on whether the poorest
participation in ISALs. Most studies have focused on the impact of ISALs on the
livelihoods of the poor, however this will inquire whether the poorest
participates in ISALs and what has been the impact of the methodology on
poverty eradication. Academics and programme managers can make use of the
information that will be cultivated in this study.
Few researches have covered ISALs in Gokwe South hence there is a genuine
motivation to cover this gap. Most research has targeted ISALS in Zimbabwe as a
whole there is a need to move from the general to the particular. Hopefully the
research will provide enlightening revelations in issues of programming in the
area under study as well as in other areas.
Hulme (2000) states that impact assessment studies keeps donors, it is in
this regard that such a study can be used by donors who have invested training
in ISALs hence this study can be a review of their money’s worth. The study can
provide prospective donors in the programme a glance of the effectiveness of
the funding methodology.
Aim
To assess the impact of ISALs on poverty reduction in Gokwe South.
Objectives
v To
assess the operationalisation of the ISAL model in Gokwe South
v To
assess the benefits of ISALs.
v To
assess the challenges of ISALs
Research Questions
v What
category of people has joined ISALS and the reasons of joining?
v How
has ISALs improved the lives of people?
v Does
ISALs uplift the poorest?
v What have been the challenges of ISALs?
De-limitation of the study
The research is confined to ISAL groups in Gokwe South District that are
in the following wards Nemangwe, Chisina and Huchu. The main reason is that
there is a concentration of ISAL groups in these areas as per the database of
the Ministry of Women Affairs, Gender and Community Development. The majority
of training of these ISAL groups has been done by Concern Worldwide a Non
Governmental Organisation (NGO) which is no longer operating in Zimbabwe.
Caritas a faith based organization has trained about 90 groups. World Vision
has trained 233 groups.
This research is not periodised since it will use cross sectional design
in its methodology. A single point in time will be used to evaluate the extent
ISALs have fared in poverty eradication. Most studies have looked at ISALS as a
strategy for empowering women however this research will not confine itself to
a particular sex.
This study will not review books generally written on microfinance since
the topic is broad it will limit its focus to literature written on Village
Savings and Lending or ISALs. Attention will focus on recent studies that have
been done on ISALs.
The term mukando will be used to mean Internal Saving and lending
or Village Savings and lending Association. The term has been used to refer to ROSCAs
by scholars like Mbizi and Gwangwava (2012).
Limitations of the Study
Gokwe South is farming area which will make interviews difficult since
most of the time people will be busy in the field. The researcher will be
limited to conducting the interviews on Thursday on which is the day set for
field breaks known as Chisi.
The bureaucratic nature of most organizations of certain NGOs and
Government poses another threat to the research. The researcher will ensure
that all required permission is sought in time to avoid disappointment during
interviews. Permission of the local
leadership will be sought before getting into the villages to make interviews.
Ethical consideration will be taken into account by seeking permissions
of the interviewees. In addition guaranteeing confidentiality to participants
will be used as way to ensure 100% responses from the interviews.
Assumptions
The researcher assumes that there will be positive responses to the
interviewees especially from the groups of ISALs. The researcher is
anticipating that the local leadership will not give resistance to the study
and that they will influence the groups to participate. Since personal
information will be given in the interview the researcher will guarantee
confidentiality to the respondents.
The researcher assumes that he will be able to meet the deadlines of the
study. The researcher believes that timely submissions will be made to the
authorities.
Definition of terms
Poverty Reduction/ Alleviation – Is removing beggary and creating
self sufficiency through transformative change by improving lives by reducing
the negative impact of poverty and the levels of deprivation as far as possible
to meet the basic needs.
ISALs - Internal Savings and Lending Schemes is broad it covers
self –financing schemes both in urban and rural areas while village and Savings
and lending are schemes which targeted rural areas.
Poor – People who have relative access to human basic needs
Poorest - People who experience extreme poverty or absolute
poverty where access to basic needs is evident.
Literature Review
ISALs and Women Empowerment
Rambo (2012)
article assessed the empowerment of women through the Village Savings and Loan
Schemes in Rachuonyo District. Through using a cross- sectional survey design and triangulation of research approaches he
concluded that there was a significant difference in terms of the amount
invested in business, net returns on capital, ownership of properties such as
land, business premises as well as production equipment and machinery. Women were able to use the returns obtained
from VSL to acquire production factors such as equipment, skills and business
premises. Financial discipline was another positive component that
characterized women who were engaged in VSL than those who did not. His
research slanted towards how VSL affected women, while this research will look
at ISAL groups without any exclusion on the basis of gender. His research
pointed out that one of the major challenges of VSL effectiveness was poverty a
position that is ambiguous to this inquiry. The research needs ascertain the
extent ISALs have managed to be a mitigating strategy against poverty.
Chuma (etal., 2013) examined ISALs as survival strategy for female
–headed households in Mucheke in the city of Masvingo in Zimbabwe. Their
research concluded that ISALs played a crucial role in meeting the basic needs.
In addition owing to ISALS female headed household managed to buy household
furniture, pay tuition fees for their children, and generate hospital fees as
well make food provisions for the families. The study glosses over the
participation of the poorest in ISALS. The study looked at the urban context of
ISALS but this study will focus on the impact on the rural areas.
Participation in ISALs
Rasmussen (2013) in his PHD thesis investigated the impact of savings and
loan associations in Malawi through using a randomized control trial a method
borrowed from medicine. The scholar randomly chose 46 villages where the half
acts as the control and the other as an experiment. The experiment villages has
ISALs established will the control the status quo is left to prevail. The
outcome of the research proved that savings and loans association were indeed
important however the poorest of the poor did not participate. While his
research was hands-on due to the availability of resources at his disposal this
research will base its findings on from interventions that has been done by
various organizations who has set ISALs like Ministry of Women Affairs, Gender
and Community Development Ministry of Women Affairs, Gender and Community
Development (MWAGCD), Concern , World Vision
and Caritas.
ISALs and Poverty Reduction
Katabarwa (2009) assessed the contribution of ISALs to
household income poverty eradication in Mubende District in Uganda.140
respondents were used in his study from randomly selected villages who had
practiced ISALs. The scholar used a triangulation of qualitative and
quantitative research method. The former approach was used in form of focus group
discussions while the latter was used to collect information from
beneficiaries, their spouses and children in different households. Her findings
showed that 71.7% of the respondents agreed that ISALs had eradicated poverty
in their households while 28.3% disagreed. This research will use her approach
to measure how ISALs in Gokwe South have managed to eradicate poverty. The
findings of her study cannot be generalized to the rest of the world where
ISALs has been used as an intervention for poverty eradication. This study will
add to the existing body of knowledge that is already available.
Brannen (2010)
in his study examined the impact of VSLA in Zanzibar in Tanzania. His
hypotheses tested positive for the following assumptions that ISALs provided
(1) improvements in economic and social welfare of the household: (2) growth
and diversification in income-generating activities (IGAs) : and (3) increased
empowerment (social , as well economic ) for members. Similary the study that
was done by Anyango, Eipisu, Opoku , Johnson , Musoke and Malkamaki (Vol.18
,No.1)observed that VSL had expanded to 4,500 members and groups were getting
returns of savings as high as 53 percent.
Sustainability of ISALs
Hamadziripi (2008) article examined the importance of
networking and linking and trade offs in Member Owned Institutions like VSLAs
in Niger. In addition it looked at the trade –offs between accumulating and
cashing out. His case study comprised of 25 VSLA groups in the Tahoua region
networked and non-networked. He observed that networking threatened internal
governance leading it to be more complex and sophisticated. Ownership and
control of the VSLAs that have been networked was traded off to Care. His
assessment proved that VSALs had more to lose from networking. The
sustainability of networked VSLAs was fragile since they dependent much on
subsidies. His research argued that networked VSLAs had little prospects of
appealing and reaching the remote areas effectively because it was complex and
sophisticated. Outreach to remote areas remained elusive to networked VSLAs.
Hamadziripi noted that about 50% of women who participated in VSALs were in the
vulnerable category thus “They had only one house with one or two rooms and one
small granary but do not produce enough to feed for themselves half the time.
They are estimated to be 60% of the commune households.” (Hamadziripi 2008:2)
This research will investigate what sort of people are joined ISALs and to what
extent has it transformed their lives. With the proliferation of ISALs into
urban areas the research examines there is any noticeable difference between
ISALs that are practiced in urban areas compared to those in the rural areas.
Allen’s (2003)
article ‘CARE International’s Village Savings & Loan Programmes in Africa:
Micro Finance for the Rural Poor that Works’ traced the origins, methodology
and impact in Niger, Zimbabwe, Zanzibar and Uganda. His study revealed that
more than 162,000 women receiving financial services in rural Niger. Women were
able to articulate needs in other areas, such as literacy, health and legal aid
training. There was major impact on self-confidence, self-esteem and social
status. Capital mobilised nationwide was close to $3.0 million (Allen 2003).
The challenges were investment were restricted only to short-term activities,
such as trading and food processing. Agriculture, the main economic activity in
Niger, could not be financed owing to the short-term nature of the loans and
because agriculture was seen as inherently more risky. Some of the stronger
graduated groups remain inhibited by the small size of the loans and were
actively seeking linkages to credit unions. The legal and policy framework of
the country was poorly understood with respect to women’s property rights
(Allen 2003) In Zimbabwe there was an increase of women joining ISALs and
groups formed and increase in savings. The research concluded that even in a
high inflationary environment there was an increase in livelihood security and
increasing purchasing power. In Zanzibar the Grameen Bank methodology (JOSACA)
was used where external funds were provided to the groups after they had
managed to raise the required 10% of the external loan. Josaca used shares
instead of fixed contribution from members (Allen 2002:40). Overall the program
was able to inculcate a culture of saving, high level of community awareness
and positive programme reputation and reduced negative impact on forest
reserves owing to diversification of income generating activities (Allen 2002).
In Uganda, Jenga methodology was used which is similar to MMD used in Niger.
The impact was felt in the growing number of VSL groups, household income and
confidence of women. Mali used the JOSACA methodology with following
characteristics: extending the training period from 8 months to 10 months, in
order to accommodate the introduction of themes and messages unrelated to
savings and credit, varying lengths of loan terms, shareholding in order to
permit varying amounts of contribution and formalisation of social fund contributions.
The impact has been the existence of autonomous management of savings and
credit activities by groups, large number of women joining in a short time and
generation of significant resources to meet household needs.
Explanations of poverty
Poverty has been
explained and defined in various ways by different scholars. Handley (etal.,
2009) cites that since Second World War the western definition of poverty
explains it in terms monetary terms through measuring the levels of income and
consumption. The poor are those who fall under a given line called a poverty
datum line. World Summit on Millennium Development Goals (2005) asserted that
poverty is not only a matter of income, but also, more fundamentally, a matter
of being able to live a life in dignity and enjoy basic human rights and
freedoms[1].
However Amartya Sen (1982) saw poverty as capacity deprivation which goes
beyond material lack or want it included human capabilities for example skills
, physical abilities and also self respect in society. Similarly Muzale as
cited (Dhemba 1999) shares the same sentiments that poverty is more than a
physiological phenomenon denoting a lack of basic necessities like food ,
health and clothing , but it is state of deprivation and powerlessness, were
the poor are exploited and denied participation in decision making in matters that intimately affect
them.
The Human Rights
perspective of poverty describes it as “denial of person’s rights to a range of
basic capacities such as the capability to be adequately nourished, to live in
good health, and to take part in decision making processes and in the social
and cultural life of the community”(UNHCR 2012:2)[2]
A rights approach is used to address poverty. In the language of rights, one
may say that a person living in poverty is one for whom number of human rights
remain unfulfilled—such as the rights to food, health, political participation
and so on ”(UNHCR 2012)[3].
One reason why the human rights framework is compelling in the context of
poverty reduction is that it has the potential to empower the poor (Human
Rights and Poverty Reduction 2004). [4]
Empowerment can be described as a process of increasing the capabilities of
poor individuals or groups to make choices and to transform those choices into
desired actions and outcomes, and to participate in, negotiate with, influence,
control and hold accountable the institutions that affect their lives (UNHCR
2012). [5]
Poverty has been
split into two broad categories which are absolute and relative poverty.
Absolute poverty can be explained using the basic needs theory of poverty.
According Bradshaw (2006) absolute poverty is lack of basic necessities such as
food; shelter, medical care, and safety generally thought necessary, based on
shared values of human dignity.
According
Valentine (1968) argues that relative deprivation is embedded in inequality.[6]
Inequality is characterized by unfair distribution of resources which results
in the widening of the rich- poor gap. Unfair systems do not provide safety net
for those are poor hence there is need for Governments to come up with
mechanisms that address inequality as a step towards alleviating poverty. Most
financial systems such as commercial banks are exclusionary than inclusionary
for the poor. Access to credit for the poor can be a move towards addressing
unequal practices.
Synopsis of
microfinance and poverty
Microfinance has
been defined by Schreiner and Colombet (2001:339) as “the attempt to improve
access to small deposits and small loans for poor households neglected by
banks.” Otero sees microfinance “the provision of financial services to low-income
poor and very poor self-employed people” (www.dochas.ie/share/files/2/).
Microfinance institutions play an important service of offering financial
services to the poor.
A significant
number of literatures prove that there is a positive correlation between access
to finance, economic growth and poverty alleviation (Swamy and B.K Tulasimala
2013). Scholars like Littlefield, Zaman, Morduch Hashemi and Montgomery believe
microcredit will reduce poverty. T. Pham and R Lensink asserts that access to
credit will result in the rise of investments in income generating activities ,
diversification of sources of income, accumulation of assets, it can reduce the
vulnerability due to illness, drought and crop failure, and it can contribute
to a better education, health and housing of the borrower (www.pegnet.ifw-/kiel.de/event).
Scully argues that microfinance does not reach the poorest, on the basis that
the loans wanted by the poorest are too small to generate significant interest
income for lenders, further microlenders are under pressure from donors to
become financially self sustaining (www.gdrc.org/icm/wind/micro.html)
hence there are forced to lend moderate poor.
Obed Gilbert Fredrick Mwalughali (2013) thesis looked at the impact of
Community Savings and Investment Program on household income and credit market
participation in Kasungu District in Central Malawi. His research did not focus
ISALS however it gave insights on how the Community Savings and Investment
Program (COMSIP) had fared for farmers in a rural setup. While ISALs looks at
internal funding by members of the group the Community Savings and Investment
Program is externally funded by the government to cooperatives. These
cooperatives provide credibility to farmers and acts as collateral for farmers.
This research will look at how the ISALs have managed to eradicate poverty in
Gokwe South.
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework
This research uses the theory of change which states that if the
intervention is able to bring positive changes and is able to meet unmet
financial demands it would have positively transformed lives. Secondary
theories like the Basic Needs theory as basis of measuring the impact of ISALs
in mitigating poverty. The question which is asked by this research is that
does ISALs provide the poor or poorest with a venue that will make them get the
basics. The research uses Household economic portfolio (HEPM) model to assess
the impact at individual, household and enterprise and community levels.
Different economic and social variables will be looked at such as expenditure,
consumption, assets and ability to send children to school, access to health
and social position. Assets are important since there do not fluctuate like
other economic indicators. The intermediary school of thought will be used to
assess outreach and sustainability of ISALs. If outreach and sustainability
have been enhanced then the intervention is judged to have a beneficial impact
(Hulme 2000).
Research Methods
The Area of Study
Zimbabwe is situated in the sourthern part of Africa. It borders with Mozambique,
South Africa, Botswana and Zambia to the east, south, west and north,
respectively. The country is land locked with a total area of approximately
390.757 square kilometers, and, it has a population of 12.973.808 persons
according to the preliminary results of the 2012 (Zimstat 2013:1). Zimbabwe has
10 provinces which are, Mashonaland Central , Mashonaland West, Mashonaland
East , Manicaland, Masvingo, Matebeland South , Mateleland North, Midlands and
metropolitan provinces of Harare and Bulawayo.
Gokwe South is situated in the Midlands Province with a geographical coordinates
of 180 13′ 0′′ South , 280 56′0′′ East (www.maplandia.com/Zimbabwe/Midlands/gokwe/gokwe/
)[7].
It is a cotton growing town located 356 km from the capital of
Zimbabwe, Harare and 140 km from the city of Kwekwe. It falls under Zimbabwe’s
agro ecological zones of region III and IV the former is a semi intensive
farming region which receives (650
- 800 mm) and the latter is under semi arid areas which receives poor
rainfall between (450 -
650 mm ) (OCHA Map). 79.0% of the people are communal farmers and only
0.4 % is unemployed. Gokwe South has a total
population of 331386 which consist of 159187 males and 172199 females, in 69619
Households (Census 2012). The district has 39 wards of which 33 are
categorized as rural. The administration town is called Gokwe Centre which has
a single vocational training centre which specializes in training the community
in various crafts such as welding, carpentry and boiler making, various banking
institutions such as Commercial Bank of Zimbabwe (CBZ), POSB, Agribank and
CABS. Microfinance institutions include Women Development and Savings Credit
Union, Zambuko Trust, Paramount Holdings and Microfin henceforth the rural
people have to travel to get these services. Gokwe South has 75.3% of poverty
compared to 44% of Gokwe Centre and 17.9% of the people living in extreme
poverty compared to 4.8%. (See graph below). This information shows that the
Gokwe town is far better than the rural areas.
(Percent
Poverty Prevalence Zimstat 2013, p i)
Gokwe South Map
Poverty Index
Research Methodology
This
study will use a cross sectional design to ascertain the impact of ISALs on
poverty reduction at a given time. The researcher will make use of
methodological and data triangulation. The former refers to gathering data
through several sampling strategies, so that slices of data at different times
and social situations, as well as on variety of people, are gathered. The
latter refers to the use of more than one method for gathering data (www.referenceworld.com/mmr.pdf).[8]
Focus Group discussions and semi structured questionnaires will be used on
groups who are participating or who have already participated on ISALs. The
Ministry of Women Affairs, Gender and Community Development database will be
used to draw a sample through stratified random sampling from the target
population of 323 groups composed of 2315 members. The sample should cover the
three wards which are covered by the database thus 33.3% should come from each
ward. Using the online Survey System Package the sample size will be 148 with
90 % confidence level and using the confidence interval of 5% hence each ward
will have a sample of 49 each (www.surveysystem.com/sscal.htm).
243 individual questionnaires to ISAL members were picked randomly from the total
population of 2315 with 90 % confidence level and 5% confidence interval.
One on one,
telephonic and electronic interview will be conducted to professional people
who are involved in ISALS training such as Women Affairs Staff, VSL founder
Allen Hugh, former programme manager and Country Director for Concern.
Permission for the interviews of these people has already been sought.
Individual interviews will also include non members of ISALs who will be drawn
through purposive sampling. Snowballing will be used to select the individuals
who are not members of any ISAL groups.
Primary sources
from organization and groups in terms of monthly, quarterly and annually
reports will be used in the research. Secondary sources will be instrumental in
data analysis and literature reviews in the research.
Time & Budget
Activity
|
Time
|
Cost
|
Submission of
Proposal
|
21 July
|
$ 20
|
Chapter 1
|
28 July
|
$ 10
|
Chapter 2
|
8 August
|
$10
|
Chapter 3
|
15 August
|
$10
|
Chapter 4
|
22 August
|
$ 100
|
Chapter 5
|
5 September
|
$ 10
|
Submission of
1st Draft
|
10 September
|
$ 20
|
Total
|
$180
|
Conclusion
The research
will use a book format approach Chapter 1 will cover the Introduction of the
study, Literature review and methodology. This chapter will explore various
funding methodologies that have been used in Zimbabwe such as ROSCAs and SACCOs.
Chapter 2 will look at various theories of poverty and strategies that has been
used to mitigate poverty and the historical background of poverty in Zimbabwe. Chapter
3 will look at a historical background of microfinance in Zimbabwe. Chapter 4
will look at the socio-economic characteristics of the members of ISALs.
Chapter 5 will present the findings of the research paying particular attention
to the impact of ISALs on poverty reduction looking at various variables such
as household income, education and assets acquisition.
CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND OF
POVERTY IN ZIMBABWE.
2.1 Introduction
In order to understand
the mitigation method in question it is of paramount importance to trace poverty
in Zimbabwe thus how it came to be and the key drivers to date. This chapter
traces poverty in Zimbabwe and explores the key drivers.
2.2 Historical Background of Poverty in
Zimbabwe
Poverty
Reduction Forum Trust (2013) traces structural poverty to the colonial
administration, the pre-independence Zimbabwe was characterized by imbalances
and inequality skewed in favour of the white minority. The colonial government
gave whites elevated privileges which included well resourced and well-equipped
commercial farms acquired through massive land appropriation while black people
were confined to poor unproductive overcrowded rural areas and densely
populated urban townships run by poorly resourced African councils (Poverty
Reduction Forum Trust 2013). In addition peasants were forced to work in white
owned farms and mines. The post –independence resettlement scheme under willing
buyer and willing seller programme including agricultural extension services
program and social protection schemes which assisted the blacks with farming
implements and inputs failed to redress land imbalances and to address
structural poverty. The adoption of liberalization of the economy worsened
poverty in Zimbabwe as indicated below.
UNHABITAT (2005)
pointed out that three political factors economic crisis in the 1990s, that is,
unbudgeted cash handouts to war veterans in 1997 and military intervention the
DRC and the Fast Track Land Reform which triggered an inflationary spiral.
Similarly Fowale (2010) also points to these three events as having caused
economic crises that had resulted in poverty escalating.
1990-2000
3.1 Adoption of Economic Structural
Adjustment Programme (ESAP) 1991-1995.
Zimbabwe adopted ESAP in October 1990 following the advice of the
World Bank and IMF as preconditions of getting financial loans. The Framework
of ESAP was spelt out in the document entitled Zimbabwe: A framework for
Economic Reform (1991-95). The nation was then forced to abandon
socialistic principles it had been following since independence since 1980.
Neoliberal policies were adopted which entailed rolling back the state from
active participation in the economy. Neoliberal principles were enshrined in
ESAP which meant the government had to reduce expenditure through removal of
subsidies, cost recovery, civil service rationalization and parastal reform,
trade liberalization including deregulation of foreign trade, investment and
production and devaluation of the local currency. ( Biljlmakers , Bassett &
Sanders (1996), Dhliwayo 2001). ESAP had serious negative socio-economic
impacts.
The removal of subsidies and cost recovery in
education and health sectors, resulted in swelling numbers of children out of
school, people dying of curable diseases in their homes and women giving birth
at home or in scotch carts on their way to health centers in rural areas.
Participation in prenatal services declined; maternal death and mortality rates
of babies. Wages of health personnel declined resulting in the mass exodus of
qualified staff, low morale and general discontent. Hospitals faced critical
drugs and equipment shortages; they faced congestion at casualty departments
and mortuaries. The quality of health care deteriorated at most hospitals
especially in rural areas. More deaths were reported in the rural areas
compared to towns (Dhliwayo 2001). According Matunhu and Mago (2013) people who were
retrenched headed back to their rural areas to join a stream of people suffering
income poverty. It
can postulated that most of the people who been the source of income for the
rural folk hence their retrenchment worsened their poverty.
The Poverty
Assessment Study of 1995 observed that 45 % of the population were found to be
very poor since they could not meet basic nutritional requirements and 61% were
found to be poor indicating there were able to buy enough food but not other
goods and services that are considered a requirement. Poverty was more
prevalent in rural areas by 75 % compared 39 % of the urban areas (Biljlmakers
, Bassett & Sanders 1998: 104). Higher levels of poverty were recorded in
rural areas (75% of households) compared to urban households (39% of
households) (www.afraca.org/publications/508Zimbabwe
).
The effects of
Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPS) were not unique to Zimbabwe alone but
other Least Development Countries (LDCs) who had adopted them. SAPS
compromised food security in many countries for example UNCTAD (2008) observed
that in 2006, on average, 20 per cent of the LDCs food consumption was
imported, and in some countries the share was higher for example Lesotho had
67%, Gambia 82%, Mauritania 32%, Malawi 31%. After adopting SAPS Haiti was forced to apply a series of trade
liberalization policies which led to a reduction of tariffs protecting the
production of crops, including rice. This opening allowed indiscriminate entry
of subsidized US rice which was sold far below the price at which local farmers
could produce it. This resulted in loss of work for the peasantry leading to
importation of rice (www.internationalviewpoint.org). Many
developing countries, especially LDCs, which are traditionally food-exporters,
became net food-importers.
3.2 Unbudgeted compensation for the War
Veterans (1997)
The
disgruntlement of war veterans that had participated in the Second Chimurenga
having been caused by deteriorating economic conditions forced the President
Robert Mugabe to give grants. It should be note that the move was not a popular
move among the parliamentarians and the decision had to be passed by a
Presidential decree (Gudza 2007). Over Z$4.5 billion was paid as
gratuities to 52 000 claimants (Mazarire and Rupiya).[9]
As a result the
Zimbabwe Dollar fell by 71.5 percent against the greenback while the stock
market crashed by 46 percent as investors rushed for the US dollar (IOL 2007).
This compensation was unbudgeted and had to be covered by massive printing of
money resulting in the rise of inflation worsening the already ailing economy
that had ransacked by the adoption of ESAP. With collapsing of the local
currency poverty in Zimbabwe increased.
3.3 Zimbabwe military involvement in the
DRC (1997-2002)
The economic reasons
for Zimbabwe’s military involvement in the DRC conflict in 1997 are a matter of
controversy among scholars. Some scholars argues that involvement in the DRC
conflict was a matter of diverting the people’s attention from the economic
doldrums , while others argue that the DRC was suppose to be the answer to
mounting economic problems (Rupiya 2002 , Shivji 1999). Despite these views the
involvement had a share in contributing to poverty in Zimbabwe. The DRC war fed
from the budget of Zimbabwe the Ministry of Defence gobbled money that could
have been invested in development. The budget estimate for Defence in 1998 was $5.540.187.000 however the
actual amount, which was used, was in 1999 was Z$5,540,247,000.[10]In 2000
the expenditure was estimated to be Z$13,292,479,000 but the actual that used
was $16,207,579,000.[11] The
Financial Gazette reported that army used more than 12 percent of the total revenue for 2001, the
paper quoted figures that had been presented to the IMF by the finance minister. The Government was reported to have spent Z$16.208
billion instead of 13.3 billion that was budgeted for by the finance minister.
[12] It was
estimated that US1.3
million per month or 0.4 per cent of the Gross National Product
was spend on the war (Gudza 2007). The economic and social implications of the
DRC conflict resulted in the increase of poverty levels.
3.4 Fast Track Land Reform Program (FTLRP)
The FTLRP which was launched in 2000 had two primary aims of
compulsory land acquisition and redistribution (Zikhali 2008). Two models were
adopted the A1 which was meant to decongest communal areas and was targeted
land constrained farmers in the communal areas. The A2 model comprised of small
medium and large commercial settlements (Zikhali 2008). Kinsey (2010) argues
that, the forced seizure
of thousands of commercial farms in the name of land reform in the beginning of
2000has been a major contributor to the dramatic worsening of poverty levels
nationally. Richardson (2004) observed that agricultural production plummeted
by 30% while the manufacturing sector dropped by 15 %. The absence of tenure
for the beneficiaries made it difficult for them to acquire loans from the
banks to invest in the newly acquired land. Despite the loans set aside by the
Reserve Bank through Commercial Banks most farmers did not access the facility
Chamunorwa (2010). The Poverty Reduction Forum Trust 2013 argues the FTLR
worsened rural poverty as it affected those who were employed on commercial
farms lost employment and reverted to rural areas that were .already congested.
In addition the chaotic manner in which land reform was done attracted
sanctions European Union, the US and several Commonwealth countries
Scholars
like Zikhali (2008) argues that FTLRP mitigated poverty by pointing out that
resettled farmers were more productive than communal farmers. However the
scholar failed to compare the production of the ousted commercial farmers and
the new settled farmers.
Chamunorwa (2010: 7) observed that 1.3
million people including farm owner and farm worker households, lived on and
off 4,660 large-scale commercial farms covering over 10 million hectares (ha),
while over 1 million households (5.6 million people) in the communal areas
subsisted on 1.6 million ha. By
June 2009, a total of 725,000 ha arable land was given for A1, small scale
commercial and large scale commercial, 710,000 arable land for A2, 250,0000ha
for communal and 800 ha for old resettlement (Chamunorwa 2010 citing FAO 2009).
2000 – 2008
3.5 Operation Restore Order /Murambatsvina /Tsunami 2005
The
demolition of illegal demolition of urban settlement was coded operation
Murambatsvina which literally meant ‘driving and cleaning out dirt or refusal’
(Dzimiri and Runhare 2012). It aimed at putting a stop to illegal activities in
contravention of municipal by-laws, such as the erection of illegal structures,
illegal vending, touting by commuter omnibus rank marshals, illegal street
garaging, illegal cultivation, dealing illegally in foreign currency and
prostitution. The affected people were told to go back to their rural areas
(Dzimiri and Runhare 2012).
The UN
envoy report (2005:20) outlined the following reasons for the Operation
Murambatsvina:
A. was a result of general
concern over increasing chaos and congestion in the central business district
of Harare and other major cities over which the Government was being blamed by
the middle class; nostalgia over the role of Harare as the “Sunshine City” was
on the rise;
B. was an act of retribution
against areas known by the Government to have voted for the opposition during
the last few presidential and parliamentary elections;
C. could have been conceived
by a number of individuals as part of the politics of succession to President
Mugabe;
D. was a means of checking the
power and influence of the war veterans, or ex-combatants;
E. was a means to increase the
flow of foreign currency through the "Homelink" scheme;36
F. was a pre-emptive strategy
designed to prevent popular uprising, in light of deepening
food
insecurity and other economic hardships;
G. was a mechanism designed to
re-possess control of the conduct of business by some political leaders in the
ruling party, thus establishing a system of political patronage over urban
areas
H. was a scheme to divert the
attention of the President away from his increasing concerns over the
underutilization of newly acquired commercial farms in rural areas; and
I. represented a desire on the
part of some political leaders to engineer a reverse urban-to rural migration
process, on the wrong belief that this was good for Zimbabwe’s national
development.
The
operation had serious social, institutional, political and economic
consequences. It was estimated that 700 000 lost their homes and business
because of the operation while 2.4 million were affected (Tibaijuka 2005:
UNHABITAT 2005). Chibisa and Sigauke (2008:40) ‘an
estimated 90 000 vendors had their bays demolished. A total of 92 460 housing
structures were demolished, directly affecting 133,534 households. At the same
time 32 538 premises/structures of small, micro and medium size enterprises
were demolished as per government figures released on 7 July 2005.’ 97 614
people lost their primary source of livelihood (Tibaijuka 2005). Dzimiri and Runhare (2012)
argue that 40% of the jobs in the informal sector were lost during the
operations. The evictions destroyed livelihoods and forced and urban to
rural migration (Chibisa and Sigauke 2008: Dzimiri and Runhare 2012). The
plummeting economic conditions were worsened by Operation Murambatsvina. The
displacement of people from urban areas to rural areas affected families who
had been supported by their kinsmen in the urban areas. The burden fell on
rural people to support the displaced who had chosen to return back.
3.6 Sanctions
The
sanctions against Zimbabwe are enshrouded in controversy with the West arguing
that there are not sanctions but restrictive measures ring fenced against
targeted individuals. The Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Act of (2001) cited
that sanctions were because ‘economic mismanagement, undemocratic practices and
the costly deployment of troops in the DRC’. On the other hand ZANU PF views
sanctions as comprehensive having being driven by the land reform.
Hove
(2012) argues that the sanctions caused serious shortages of cash in banks,
collapse of health, education and water services. The sanctions were argued to
have caused a hyper –inflation which hampered the country’s ability to obtain
foreign currency. Developmental Aid was
halted after the imposition of sanctions. The Danish International Development
Agency stopped the US29.7 million programme which was aimed supporting the
Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (MOHCW) while the Swedish government
stopped aUS6.4 million programmed aimed at improving water and sanitation,
health and conditions for the disabled and the prevention of HIV and related
behaviours. (Hove 2012). DANIDA is said to have stopped another 15.4 million
Agricultural programme which was meant
at developing agriculture , supporting irrigation schemes for small farmers and
supporting them to start income generating activities. In addition it also
halted 48 million dollar project which was meant at rural rehabilitation and
maintenance of roads (www.rbz.co.zw/farm_mech?sanctions.pdf). Stopping of these
programmmes also meant retrenching employees and stagnation of rural
development. The poverty Reduction Trust (2013) argues that despite the
controversy of sanctions Manicaland poverty is partly because of sanctions.
Sanctions
has led to Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) changing their area of focus
and their modus operandi from developmental aid to humanitarian assistance
which has short term impact and rarely contribute to economic development and
poverty reduction (www.rbz.co.zw/farm_mech?sanctions.pdf). Donor flight has been
another repercussion of sanctions due to bad public by the West. According to
RBZ “the imposition of targeted sanctions has precipitated negative perceptions
about Zimbabwe…The negative perceptions make it difficult for private and
public enterprises to secure funding, as donor funding agencies are no longer
willing to support projects in Zimbabwe” (www.rbz.co.zw/farm_mech?sanctions.pdf).
Following
sanctions multi –financial institutions like International Monetary Fund (IMF),
The African Development Bank (AfDB) and World Bank (WB) withdraw developmental
aid to Zimbabwe. From 2002 to 2007, Zimbabwe failed to acquire a single loan
from these banks (www.rbz.co.zw/farm_mech?sanctions.pdf). This shows that despite
the claim that these sanctions were targeted they affected the economy.
Zimbabwe could not borrow money to develop itself hence worsening poverty
especially in rural areas where development of infrastructure hit a brick wall.
Poverty Drivers in Rural Zimbabwe
HIV and AIDS
Human
Immno Virus (HIV) and Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) remains a
challenge that has caused untold suffering taking a toll on morbidity and
mortality consequently leading to acceleration of poverty both in rural areas
and urban areas. Agriculture has been greatly affected since Zimbabwe can be
said to be a rural country with 68% of the population residing in rural areas
and 43.6% of the economic active people surviving on farming (CSO 2013). HIV
and AIDS affect farming in various ways such as loss of labour, low production
in yield and agricultural output and lose of agricultural assets henceforth
compromising food and nutritional security. According to FAO in 1997 maize
production had dropped by 61 % because of HIV and AIDS while the overall output
declined by 50% (www.fao.org/.../463605.htm , Reneth Mano & Innocent Matshe 2006 ).
Women are
more vulnerable to HIV than man. According Zimstat (2013) 61 % of farming is
done by women making the impact more vicious on agriculture. According to GOZ
and UN ( 2010)
The
impact of HIV and AIDS has been felt particularly in smallholder agriculture,
because women, who comprise the bulk of the farmers, are more vulnerable to
HIV, both in terms of infection and being infected, since they frequently
assume the role of caregivers, thus reducing their time in the field.
Long distances and poor roads to health centers make it difficult
for rural people to access health services. According to ZIMVAC (2013) the most
common and the biggest challenge of rural people are poor roads, transport,
infrastructure and communication while the lack of health facilities is number
the forth challenge.
Climate Change
Poverty in Zimbabwe can be attributed to climate
change which has caused devastating droughts, erratic rainfall and cyclones.
Manyeruke (etal., 2013: 271) noted that the effects of climate change has been
grossly felt by African countries grappling with scarce food reserves and
poverty. The effects drought can be seriously felt because the farming is the
main economic activity for most Zimbabweans and the source of basic household
food supply. Nyati (2012) noted the 1992 drought was the worst which left most
people in a poverty trap without livestock and draught power. In the 2011/12 season, Zimbabwe was forced to
import over 50% of its maize requirements (Manyeruke., etal 2013) this has been
caused by successive droughts from 2002-2003, 2004-2005 and 2007-2008. Majengwa (etal 2012) observed
that drought had social , political and
economy implications on the country. They argue:
(Sic
Three years after independence) were
drought years which led Zimbabwe to borrow causing debt problems later (Hanlon
et al., forthcoming). In 1991/92, Zimbabwe witnessed the worst drought ...This
pushed the country into accepting the ESAP. The drought years of 1993/94 and
1994/95 worsened the economic problems caused by adjustment and fed into the
strikes and disruptions. Then 2001/02 drought occurred in the first year that
farmers had land under the Fast Track Land Reform, making it harder for new
farmers to become established.
Floods
associated with cyclones as well as the droughts experienced in 2002 to 2008
negatively impacted food security and the household incomes for the rural
people. 265 000 people were affected by droughts between the years 2000-2009 (Manyeruke.
etal 2013). In 1999 Cyclone
Eline caused flooding in Zambezi valley in Muzarabani and Dande. According
Musarurwa and Lunga (2012) the Zambezi basin has experienced flooding in 1955,
1967, 1972, 1975, 1977, 1981 and 2000. In 2000 being the worst case ever
experienced.
Climate change
has been associated with other hazards such siltation, veld fires and land
degradation. These hazards’ are known to destroy livelihoods henceforth
entrenching and causing a spiral of poverty.
Conclusion
This
chapter defined poverty and gave various strategies that have been adopted to
combat poverty in the world. The Chapter also gave a historical background of
poverty in Zimbabwe arguing that the adoption of ESAP, unbudgeted pay out for
war veterans, the military involvement of Zimbabwe in the DRC, FTLR and
sanctions worsened poverty especially in rural Zimbabwe. The chapter also gave
other poverty drivers in rural areas which are climate change and HIV and AIDS
and their continued impact on livelihoods in Zimbabwe.
Chapter 3 Microfinance in Zimbabwe
Introduction
The chapter
looks at origins and the development of microfinance in Zimbabwe. It goes to
explain other models of lending in Zimbabwe such as ROSCAS, SACCOS, and Microfinance
Institutions. It goes further to explain working modalities of ISALs in Gokwe
South. It also looks at organizations which are implementing the programme and
how the implementation is designed.
Origins of Microfinance
Microfinance
is worldwide phenomenon which started in developed countries and it trickled down
to Third World countries like Zimbabwe as a way to better the lives of the
poor. Mago (2013) cites that microfinance evolved from microcredit which was
limited to giving small loans. The term microfinance became prominent in the 1990s
replacing microcredit. Microfinance started in the 15th century when
pawn shops were established in Europe as alternatives to usury. In 1700s, the
Irish Loan System was established in Ireland then it was followed by the
formation of financial cooperatives aimed at improving the rural and urban
people in Germany in the 19th century. By 1895 microfinance spread
to Indonesia leading to the creation of Indonesia People’s Credit Bank. Early
in 1900s savings and credit activities emerged in Latin America and other parts
of the world. Between 1950s and 1970s governments and donors adopted
agricultural credit to increase yields for the marginalized small farmers however
low repayments bogged the initiative Mago (2013).
In
1976 Muhammad Yunus a Bangladeshi social entrepreneur transformed the face of
microfinance by establishing the Grameen Bank. The Grameen model addressed
structural barriers facing the poor such as lack of collateral, high
transaction costs, high risks and systematic market bias. The bank gave small
loans to poor villagers as poverty alleviation strategy. The model used the
group lending methodology which entailed delivering financial services to the
poor people. Yunus’ approach received worldwide recognition, instead of asking
collateral the bank asked for ‘social collateral’ which involved peer pressure
strategy among group members. It recorded an overwhelming success of more than
95% repayment (Mago 2013). The model was replicated by various organizations
and banks ACCION International , the Self- Employed Women’s Association (SEWA)
bank in India, Bansol in Brazil, K –Rep Bank, Rakyat bank ; Prathama bank and
Equity Banks in Kenya ( Mago 2013). The Grameen Bank has emerged as a best
practice. By 1984 John Hatch came up with village bank concept which is unique
way of delivering non-collateral loans and services to the organized poor.
Microfinance in Zimbabwe
According to Mago (2013) microfinance in Zimbabwe dates back to the
1960s when people where organized into savings clubs. During the colonial era
the formation of Friendly Societies like Bantu Trading Cooperative Society (1938), the First African
Friendly Society (1960), Central
African Mutual Association of 1960 and the United Consumer Cooperative
Society (1964) were aimed at providing household and projects loans but
these failed to meet the needs of the poor (Raftopoulos and Lacoste 2001). The
societies failed because of a compound of constraints which were political and legal which were machinated
by the colonial state in addition to poor management of the organisations
themselves. Such constraints included various local government bylaws and
controls, and national legislation such as the Land Apportionment Act (1930)
and the Native Urban Areas Registration and Accommodation Act (1946), that
placed severe limitations on the possibility of Africans both, owning and
utilising, land in rural and urban areas (Raftopoulos and Lacoste 2001:6).
Noticeably the
Catholic Missionaries played an important role through the initiation of the
Savings Development Movement which focused on micro saving for rural women.
These clubs are reported to have attracted large numbers of members thus
growing from a mere 30 in 1970 to 60 000 in 1975 (Raftopoulos and
Lacoste 2001). After Independence in 1980, SDM was registered as a cooperative
(Bond 1998). Mago (2013) observed that in the 1980s Agricultural Finance
Cooperation (AFC) was giving loans to small farmers. The government then formed
the National Association of Cooperative Savings and Credit Unions of Zimbabwe
(NACSCUZ) under the Ministry of Community and Women’s Affairs in 1986 to mobilize
savings for the poor.
ESAP did not produce
an enabling environment for the poor since it triggered a spiral of high
interest rates and inflationary milieu. In 1996 Self Development Foundation
replaced SDM. The foundation was given support by various NGOs through the
development of sound funding methodologies, governance and establishment of
revolving funds. However the loan funds of the foundation were misused and
people were reluctant to pay (Mago 2013).
Types of Microfinance
Microfinance Institutions .
Hiatt and Woodworth (2006:471) define MFI as organizations that ‘provide small loans as
start-up capital for the unemployed poor…’ Mpofu (etal 2013) cites that
MFIs provide financial services to lower income earners and the informal sector
their service target are Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). This paper
defines microfinance institutions as organizations that give microloans and
financial services which include savings, insurance, and money transfers to the
poor who usually face access barriers from conventional banks. High operational
costs and collateral issues make the conversional banking restrictive to the
poor. According to Microfinance Information exchange (MIX) an online information
platform there are currently 2100 MFIs in 150 countries in the world an
indication of the growing number and recognition of MFIs (www.mixmarket.org ). In Zimbabwe, MFIs are registered
under Money-lending and Rates of Interest Act [Chapter 14.14].
Material
poverty, deprivation of goods and services can be addressed by microfinance
initiatives. MFIs can help people to become more economically secure. This, in
turn, has a multiplier effect on people's standard of living, enhancing basic
household welfare, such as food security, nutrition, shelter, sanitation,
health and education services. MFIs can help prevent and extricate people from
debt. Oftentimes, they liberate low-income households from moneylenders with
outrageous interest rates that often reach 100% annually. Savings and credit
services help people start or improve their own small businesses, providing
income generation and employment for themselves and their families (www.un.org/.../microfinanceinafrica.pdf ).
MFIs give
services that include financial management, legal rights business management,
as well as other support services. MFI participants, especially women, are
often empowered to speak out, assume leadership roles, and address issues
beyond their workplace, such as domestic violence. (www.un.org/.../microfinanceinafrica.pdf).
According to Victoria (etal. 2012) formalised Microfinance
Institutions (MFIs) became a significant feature of Zimbabwe’s financial
services sector in the early 1990 and they grew rapidly in the period 1990 to
2000 in response to the exponential increase in the number of micro-enterprises
requiring micro-finance services and the lack of provision of services to this
market by the large scale financial sector. 9. 90% of MFIs were established
between 1995 -1999 because of ESAP which had caused loss of employment and the
increase of cost of living this forced the affected people resorted to MFIs as
a livelihood strategy. The increase in the number of MFIs led to the
establishment of the Zimbabwe Association of Microfinance Institutions (ZAMFI),
in 1997, to provide a forum for MFIs to discuss and address common issues
facing the micro-finance sector (Victoria etal 2012).
In 2012 there
were 157 registered MFIs compared to 1700 in 2003 (Victoria etal 2012). The economic crisis of 2000-2008 was
detrimental to microfinance due to foreign currency shortages, and hyper –
inflation environment. The graph below shows the decrease of microfinance
institutions in Zimbabwe from 2003 to 2009.
(Klinkhamer 2009)
Despite the remarkable
contribution of MFIs in poverty alleviation in other countries research has
shown that this has not been the case in Zimbabwe. MFIs still face a
significant number of challenges which makes them fail to meet the financial
needs of the poor or the poorest. According Mpofu (etal. 2013) few
entrepreneurs receive loans from MFIs, due to a number of reasons such as high
interest rates (Qureshi etal. 2012) ignorance of their existence and a general
lack of trust and confidence of their operations. His study concluded that MFIs
in Bulawayo are less effective in promoting entrepreneurs’ According to Mutambanadzo
(etal. 2013) MFIs are failing to grow in Zimbabwe because of lack of funding
and competition from commercial banks and other MFIs and poor management. In addition
the MFIs are still using redundant financial systems instead of adopting the
Management Information System. A study of MFI in Pakistan showed that the
majority of the poor were failing to access microfinance because of high
interest rates, lack of group guarantors, collateral, assets, businesses and
salaried employment (Qureshi etal. 2012). Chowdhury (2009:6) asserts microfinance is not a panacea for
poverty reduction; it needs both complementary supply-side and demand-side
factors. Supply-side factors—such as good infrastructure, entrepreneurial
skills, etc.—are needed to make micro-enterprises more productive. The UN makes
a remarkable observation on MFIs which is conclusive to the role they play in
poverty eradication, it asserts that;
Microfinance
is not a panacea for poverty and related development challenges, but rather an
important tool in the mission of poverty eradication. Poverty is a
multidimensional problem, embedded in a complex and interconnected political,
economic, cultural, and ecological system. Owing to poverty's large scope and
multiplicity of actors, there is no single guaranteed approach to its
eradication. … While microfinance alone does
not improve roads, housing, water supply, education and health services, it can
play an important role in making these and other sustainable contributions to
the community. (www.un.org/.../microfinanceinafrica.pdf)
Gokwe South has
about 10 MFIs which are currently targeting civil servants. The average
interest rate of these MFIs is 20% per month which is usually repaid at the end
of the month in full. This focus on
civil servants has created a backlash at small scale farmers whose type of
business does not allow them to get money monthly but seasonally. MFIs in Gokwe
South are largely restrictive to informal businessmen despite the fact that
they should provide financial access and services to the poor entrepreneurs. The
required documentation needed to obtain a loan is limiting for the informally
employed for example pay slips, bank statements and confirmation of employment
are needed. The interests rates creates financial slaves which can be exploited
monthly hence worsen their poverty. One civil servant remarked that ‘once you get entangled in borrowing from
MFIs you will do so monthly’ (Interview, MFI client).
Savings and Credit Cooperatives Societies (SACCOs)
Chigara and Matesasira (2001: 15)
cited that the cooperative movement in Zimbabwe was a political as well as a
social movement born out of the post-colonial socialist ideology. Over the
years the movement has changed and has become less political. There are two
types of SACCOs which are worker based and community based. The former include Post
and Telecommunications Corporation and Zimbabwe Teachers' Association. The
latter are usually based in high density suburbs, growth points and rural areas
and are known as village banks. In December 2000 there were 43 SACCOs
affiliated to the apex body National Association of Cooperative Savings and
Credit Unions of Zimbabwe (NACSCUZ). Ernest and Young (2006)
noted that in 2005 there were about 200 SACCOs and only 150 were active while 55
of these were members of the NACSCUZ. Unlike banks SACCOs collect deposits and
lends to their members. In Zimbabwe, SACCOs are regulated and supervised by the
Ministry of Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMES) and they are registered under the
Cooperative Act.
SACCOs offers services
which include savings, and loan facilities and share option. The loans are
diversified to include agricultural, consumption/non-productive and for
enterprises. Very few SACCOs offer other services such as insurance and even
those that do so restrict it to cover the loan amount borrowed (Chigara and
Matesasira 2001).Some of the characteristics of SACCOs are listed below
Characteristics
v Well
established institutions that are relatively stable
v Have
significant outreach in the country : urban , peri-urban and rural
v Offer
relatively lower and consistent interests rates their members
v Well
networked with high degree collaboration
v Focus
on members welfare and livelihoods enhanced as their beneficiaries
v Increasing
growth in rural SACCOS (agri-based and enterprise based
v Lend
both for consumption and business
v Low
interest rates charged
v Low
loan loss rate
According to Ernst and Young (2006) the
shortcomings of most SACCOs are caused by inadequate supervision, poor remuneration
of SACCOs, political interference, lack of operational and financial
sustainability, restrictive constitution and choice of audit. Chigara and
Matesasira (2001) cites that SACCOs suffer from governance and ownership
problems, nonpayment on savings and no dividends payouts which results in disillusioning
the members. Furthermore most SACCOs do not comply with by-laws and the
Cooperative Act. Chigara and Matesasira (2001:16) noted that the legislation
that governs SACCOs is laced with flaws listed below:
v The co-operative structure is open to abuse by individuals within
the membership, putting member’s savings at risk.
v The legislation provides inadequate measures for control and
regulation of SACCOs.
v SACCOs are not compelled to belong to NACSCUZ as the apex
organisation and therefore they are not compelled to submit reports or accept
monitoring and inspection or audit services from NACSCUZ.
v Ministry officials tasked with administration and regulation of
co-operatives do not have the specialist knowledge needed to deal with SACCOs
v NACSCUZ as an apex organisation has no powers of enforcement of
regulations.
v More stringent measures for reporting and accountability are
needed for SACCOs than for other types of co-operative due to the nature of
their business (i.e. people's savings are at risk).
Gokwe South has only five SACCOs which are registered under
the SMES namely Mapfungautsi, Tatenda Progressive, Chitekete, Gokwe Founders
and Gokwe South Youth Savings and Credit Cooperative (GSY). GSY is under the
Ministry of Youth however the SACCO is no longer functional. The total
membership of these SACCOs is 267. Out of these SACCOs two have received a
total of US20 000 from UNDP and GSY received around US14 000 from YES JUMP
project under ILO which it dismally failed to repay (Youth Officer, Interview).
The numbers of the members are indicative that SACCOs in Gokwe South does not
meet the financial needs of the poor. The membership of these SACCOs is insignificant
when the population of the poor is taken into account.
Grassroots microfinance
Grassroots microfinance institutions are
informal and unregistered. This category is comprises of ROSCAS and ISALS.
Joining of members does not require administrative costs or intensive paper
work or documentation. Administration is basically done by members.
Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAs)
ROSCAs
are colloquially known as merry – go –
round. M. Khan and G. Lightfoot defines
ROSCAs as groups of people who come together to make cyclic contribution of a
predetermined amount to a common fund (pot), which is given repeatedly in turns
to each member until everyone gets the fund (http://www.uclan.ac.uk/lbs/research/research_institutes/files/ROSCAs_Alternative_Funding_for_Sustainable_Enterprise.pdf).[13] A ROSCA have a fixed life cycle it
pools the small savings of its members and transforms them into series of
useful lump sums each member gets in turn (Allen 2006). ROSCAs can be divided
into bidding ROSCAs, marketplace and investment ROSCAs. In investment ROSCAs
members get the exactly the amount they have contributed. In bidding ROSCA a
single person receives the contribution after pledging higher contribution and
lastly marketplace ROSCAs are organized by the professionals ROSCA runners who
collects contributions from the market and then kitty is auctioned off. The
organizer usually reserves their commission for their services and remaining
proceeds are distributed among members (Mbizi and Gwangwava 2013).[14]
ROSCAs do not
need complex documentation like in formal banks they serve two functions which
are saving and lending. The flexibility of ROSCAs allows members to peg money
they are comfortable with to pay as subscriptions. Different purposes are met
using ROSCAs such as smoothing cash flow, urgent needs and start-up capital.
Start- up capital is important in creating employment. Urgent needs cover
community emergences such as death and sickness. The funding methodology is a
simple way of raising funds and these funds do not earn interest in addition no
administration costs are charged. ROSCAs go further than fulfilling economic
function – they are important in structuring community and relationships (Mbizi
and Gwangwava 2013). Parties in a committee share more than interest in the pot: they become engaged with
one another, with each other’s businesses thereby creating a union that cannot
be dismantled which brings about development ROSCAs are by no means the whole
solution to finance gaps in small firms, but they do pay an important part in
helping resolve some of the problems (Mbizi and Gwangwava 2013). They also seem
to offer the potential for growth within a wider social context, policy-makers
would be wise to consider how they might be further encouraged or developed for
business.
According to
Katabarwa (2009) ROSCAs helped women by availing credit facilities and women
were able to invest, send children to school and repair or construct new
homesteads in Mathare Valley, in Kenya.[15]
Mbizi and Gwangwava (2013) research concluded that 80% of the ROSCAs were a
good source of finance for micro enterprises.[16]
Allen (2006) asserts that there are far more ROSCAS in the world than
Microfinance Institutions.
Advantages
Allen (2002)
observed that ROSCAs have low to zero financial costs. They came be termed poor man's bank, where money is
not idle for long but changes hands rapidly, satisfying both consumption and
production needs. Besley and Levenson (1996) found that 68% to 85% of the
Taiwanese population participate in ROSCAs which means a large number of people
is surviving on these ROSCAs thus showing their importance in the development
of the economies and also a typical example is noticed in Zimbabwe that is
another study carried in Harare- by Chamlee-Wright (2002) found 76% urban
market traders participate in ROSCAs and about 77% of these traders also have
bank account which means these ROSCAs are a driving force to development
The benefit of
the basic ROSCAS is that all the members receive finance earlier than if they
had saved it themselves, except the last person that makes them to be able to
buy large amount of goods that last long. UNCDF (2004) states that studies have
shown that microfinance plays three key roles in development. ROSCAS help very
poor households meet basic needs and protects against risks like food, clothes
hence they are associated with improvements in household economic welfare. In
addition ROSCAs help to empower women by supporting women’s economic participation.
ROSCAs promote gender equity it provides start- up capital and women are able
to own projects. Their decision making can be increase and they may even assume
new roles in the community (Littlefield et al 2003, p.4).
Disadvantages
If the ROSCA distributes money by prior agreement or by lottery
it is unlikely to be available at the time in a business cycle when it is most
useful (Mbizi and Gwangwava 2013). ROSCAs are often then used in order to save
up for household durables such as utensils or roofing sheets but relatively
ineffective as a means of capitalising productive investment. The amount of savings
is fixed and maybe inadequately matched to a person’s investment plans. There
is no rate of return on people’s investment in ROSCAs, except a marginal
time-value of- money benefit of receiving a lump sum at no interest cost before
reimbursement. According to Brannen (2010) although ROSCAs may provide a variety of social benefits
and impose savings discipline, they do not accrue interest and therefore may be
relatively ineffective for productive investment
The fact that
there are no written or legal contracts among the group members means any member can leave the group at any time
before the end of the cycle disadvantaging the other members of the group.
ISALs
According Allen (2006) ISALS started
in Zimbabwe in 1999 under the name Kupfuma Ishungu (KI) under a program which
was implemented by Care International. The initial plan had been to supply
groups with external funds following the recommendations of the project
advisor. This precipitated an influx of chancers into the program distorting
the saving behavior. Out of the 270 groups that were eligible for external
funds only 8 received the funds. However after a review the external funds
component was removed. The methodology that was adopted was a refined version
of the MMD to suit the Zimbabwean environment. Groups began accommodating
smaller numbers starting from 5. Training became shorter lasting only a week
instead of eight. KI meetings were shorter than the MMD which lasted for an
hour or more. Savings meeting comprised of disbursement excluding the need of
security box.
ISAL
Concept
Brannen (2010)
defines ISAL or VSL is an Accumulating Savings and Credit Association (ASCA),
which requires no external borrowing by, or donations to, the loan portfolio –
it is entirely self-sufficient. It differs from a Savings and Credit Cooperative
Organization (SACCO) in that it is does not receive external funding except training.
ISALs are not formally registered with the government, which allows them to
operate with less formal bookkeeping and thus they accommodate illiterate
members. However this research agrees with Vanmeenen (2010) who argues that
ISALs are more than ASCAS but they improve on ROSCAS/ASCA methodology by
creating accessible, transparent and accumulating savings, and credit groups
which are user- owned and self-managed in the communities where members reside.
MWAGCD (2008) asserts that ISALs are a micro-finance programme aims at
improving the living standards of the rural poor. ISALs target, the poorest that
are economically active. The program focuses on supporting and improving their
income generating activities and micro-business activities. ISALs are community
based, poverty alleviation programme aimed at providing sustainable access to
micro- credit and insurance. This lending model is composed of two funds thus
the loan fund and the social fund. The
former is borrowed by members for start-ups or for growth of Income Generating
Activities (IGAs) and is subsequently repaid with interest. The latter is only
used in emergencies like death, cost for health or education and it does not
accrue interests. The end of the cycle is marked by groups sharing the
interests that have accrued and the savings they have earned during the ISAL
life span. Vanmeenen
(2010) observed that through SILC/ISALs farmers are able to meet their
seasonal needs for loans for their families such as paying fees and educational
expenses at any given time throughout the year. Below is a diagram which shows some of the
uses of ISAL funds.
Adopted from MWACD ISAL MANUAL
2008
Target
Population
The Internal Savings and lending
programme is for micro entrepreneurs who have problem of accessing capital. The
programme also focuses on those with the interest of using their initiatives
and resources. The beneficiaries should be committed to joining groups to build
their capital. The participants in ISALS need to be semi literate.
Training
The training of ISALS is done by
trained personnel from organizations or community based trainers using the
facilitation method of learning. The training is done at the convenience of the
participants. The training is usually last for five and half days. The training
session should have between 15 – 25 people. The training covers group
formation, financial resource mobilisation and management. The training is
geared at capacity building in terms of simple financial literacy and basic
business management. The MWAGCD manual (2008) cites that the training should
enable entrepreneurs to form cohesive groups, mobilize their own savings which
can used to mobilize IGAS, consumption and other basic needs.
The
Facilitator
The training
methodology is participatory in orientation. The trainer should be a skilled
facilitator who is flexible, creative and be adaptive to various training
environments. The MWAGCD (2010) warns against the facilitator taking an ‘active
role’ during training. Various learning media are used during the training such
as group discussions, focus group discussions, role plays and singing. Constant
feedback to ensure the participants understand the concepts is encouraged.
Modules
covered
Self
- Selection
This module is designed
to train participations to know their weakness
and strengths before committing themselves to be members of an ISAL
group through self selection and screening
an individual would be able to evaluate themselves whether they can be part of
ISALS or not. Prospective ISAL members should exhibit characteristics of punctuality,
integrity, honesty and reliability (Vanmeenen 2010).
Group
formation and leaderships
After the
self-selection session the participants are trained to select others. Various
group dynamics are taught at this stage. According Ndhlovu (2014) trainers may
use animal allusions to symbolize various character traits of people. Lions can
be used to symbolize authoritarian leaders, giraffes may be indicative of
visionary traits while snakes can be associated as deceitful members. Sitscha
(2014) adds that this stage is fundamental to the survival of the group. Failure
to harness the different people into a single unified unity results in the
collapse of the group. Members selected
should be hard working with good community relations and willing to save.
Participants are usually encouraged to select members who they have the same
social status with. Members of the group should have intimate knowledge of the
others’ good and bad attributes, they should be aware of what motivates them
and what their household social and economic characteristics are like.
Having selected the
members the next step is forming the governance structure. The section trains
participants on leadership and leadership selection. The structure which is
recommended by the training is simple. It comprises of Chairperson, Secretary
and Treasurer. The qualities and functions of group need to be known so that
members select those that are capable and the selected know what they are
expected to do (MWAGCD 2008). The duties and the qualities of the committee are
tabulated below:
a)
Chairperson
Qualities
|
Tasks/Responsibilities
|
Strong and recognized
personality
|
Calls in meetings with the help
of the secretary
|
Good hearted and humble
|
Announces topics of day
|
Listens to others, attentive
|
Leads and guides the group
|
Patient
|
Leads discussions and maintains
control
|
Approachable
|
Sees that there is discipline
and order according to the constitution
|
Capable to lead and guide
people – observant*
|
Distributes tasks according to the
group's goals
|
Honest
|
Sees that problems are
discussed within the group
|
Intelligent and interested
|
Advises the members
|
Dynamic and visionary
|
Makes sure savings and loan
procedures are followed
|
Committed
|
Finds solutions in case of
conflict
|
Tactful
|
Represents group to outside
|
Willing to take responsibility
|
Ensures achievement of desired
results for the benefit of the entire members
|
Flexible, but consistent
|
Shares information from outside
with group
|
Organized and structured
|
Ensures group strategy and
procedures
|
Can speak in front of others
|
Is one of the bank account
signatories
|
b)
Secretary
Qualities
|
Tasks/Responsibilities
|
Capable of giving small
speeches and reports to group and outsiders
|
Calls meetings at the advice of
chairperson
|
Capable of reading, writing and
calculating
|
Takes minutes and keeps
financial records
|
Trainable for Book-keeping
|
Compares records with Treasurer
|
Honest
|
Writes and dispatches letters
|
Intelligent
|
Reports to the group and
outsiders at the advice of chairperson
|
Speaks languages
|
Records important events
|
Is one of the signatories to
the bank account
|
c)
Treasurer
Qualities
|
Functions
|
Trustworthy and honest
|
Collects saving contributions,
fines and repayments
|
Knows how to count and
calculate
|
Keeps money safe (at bank or at
home)
|
Has a safe house
|
Ensure finance records are open
to members to see and be checked by appointed bodies
|
Can resist, strong personality
|
Advises group using the
resources of its future needs
|
Keeps finance records, expenses
and bank statements
|
|
Makes sure the money is kept in
a safe place at all times
|
|
Is one of the signatories to
the bank account
|
(MWAGCD 2008)
Constitution
The training provides a
simple framework for constitution writing. The constitutions are drafted by the
groups following provided ‘guidelines’. Participants should know that the
constitution has to cover aspects that have to do with operation of their ISAL
group such membership criteria, savings amounts and frequency, what happens in
the event of loan default, death of a member, when to share amounts, interests
to charge and meetings. Group objectives should also be covered in the
constitution.
Group
Fund Development
Groups are trained to
build their funds through efficient savings and internal lending amongst members.
The participants are trained on charging interests and the benefits of doing
so. Simple financial calculation is introduced at this stage. Commitment to
repaying is emphasized.
Record keeping
According to Hugh (2002)
record keeping was included in the training especially in Zimbabwe because of
the high literacy rate this differed from the implementation in other parts of
Africa. Simple record keeping is trained to ensure transparency and accountability.
session objectives of the training during the session is to make the
participants appreciate the benefits of record keeping, know the different
types of records that are needed for a savings and credit group and be able to
write records for themselves. Lastly the groups should be able to interpret the
group records. Participants to keep the following books thus the register,
savings book, fines book, cash book and loans book as well as the constitution.
Internal Savings and lending Group development
Cycle.
Adopted
from MWACD ISAL MANUAL 2008
The diagram above shows the life
cycle of the training and support services given to ISALs groups. The base of
the diagram shows the basic training required to start ISALs. Five topics which
are membership selection, leadership, constitution making, fund development and
record keeping which have been mentioned in detail above are covered. Following
group formations pre-trained cluster facilitators makes intensive follow –up monitoring
and giving technical support to groups an exercise which takes between 4 to 6
months. The next 4 months is referred to the pre-graduation follow-up stage and which the cluster facilitator makes
recommendation on the progress of the group to the organization implementing
the process. The last stage is the graduation
stage where celebrations are held for the group. The leading organization
may issue certificates. The group may use the occasion to show what they manage
to get throughout the cycle. The cycle lasts for 16 months.
Implementers of
ISALs in Gokwe South
Ministry
of Women Affairs, Gender and Community Development (MWAGCD)
MWAGCD is
responsible at training ISALS as well as monitoring activities of partner
organizations especially NGOs, Faith Based Organization and Community Based
Organization that compliment government efforts in this regard. The Ministry of
Women Affairs Gender and Community Development is a government ministry which
was established in 2005 although the portfolios under it have existed in
different Ministries since 1981. The Ministry was given broad based mandate, on
economic empowerment and mobilization of women and communities and elimination
of gender disparities. The Ministry is comprised of five departments, two which
are service departments that are, Finance and Administration and Human Resource
.The remaining three make up the Technical Departments which are Women Affairs,
Gender and Community Development. The latter Departments are also referred to
as the line departments, because they directly execute, the mandate, goals and
objectives of the Ministry.
ISALs are trained by two main
departments which are Women Affairs and Community Development. The former
department specializes in exclusively women run projects in all sectors of the
economy including ISALS. The Community Development Department oversees ISALs
operated by both sexes. At District level the personnel who do the training of
ISALs in both departments are the same while at provincial and National level
it is done by different officers. The District office is headed by the District
Development Officer followed by two Community Development officers whose
responsibilities are supervising and training of Ward Development coordinators
(WARDCOs). The WARDCOs are located in various wards and their major
responsibility is supervising ISAL groups, collecting regular data, capacity building
and training of new groups. The Ministry is also responsible of keeping a
database of all ISAL groups in the district including those trained by other
partners. Below is a diagram which shows how the training of ISALs is conducted
by MWAGCD
TRAINING OF ISALS AND COMPILING
OF THE DATABASE
|
According an interview with Sitscha
(2014) MWAGCD is implementing the ISAL in 39 wards in Gokwe South District
where villagers conduct their own savings which they borrow and attach a
certain percentage interest when they repay. Objectives of the ISALs groups
vary some target increasing their household income others prioritize buying
household kitchenware (women ISAL groups) and others livestock.
Caritas
Zimbabwe
Caritas Zimbabwe was founded in
1972 by the then Rhodesia Catholic Bishops Conference (RCBC) to carry out
social work of the church. The organization was renamed Catholic Development
Commission (CADEC) in 1984 as way to shift its emphasis from social welfare to
development. However in Zimbabwe it still is called Caritas Zimbabwe , its ‘mandate
includes human development, emergency relief, advocacy , peace building ,
respect of human rights , and proper stewardship of the planet’s environment
and resources’ ( www.caritas.org ).
Caritas trains ISAL groups and
provides monitoring up to graduation level. According to the programme officer
the training takes 5 days while monitoring takes 3-6 months (Mr. Ndhlovu 2014,
interview, 1/9/2014). The training content is similar to what is trained by the
MWAGCD. The aim of ISALs is to help communities budget their money especially
after harvesting so that they do not run out of cash. This stemmed from the
realization or acquisition of seasonal income which characterized most communities.
Caritas Zimbabwe realized that farmers would have money briefly after harvesting
that rarely lasted to the next harvest. The ISAL programme was then designed to
promote a culture of saving and investing. The organization argues that if
communities are able to save and invest the chances of them following under the
reigns of poverty is minimized. Dependency on external loans or contract
farming which is usually exploitative is minimized (Mr. Ndhlovu 2014, interview,
1/9/2014).
The programme was also designed
to help communities mobilize and manage their resources without external help.
This was a shift from the provision of hardware components such as fertilizers,
grants, external loans and other building material. The methodology adopted by
Caritas aimed at removing dependence syndrome of communities on donors to
spearhead and dictate the pace of development. Emphasis is given on the
utilization of local available resources rather external donations.
To ensure sustainability and
continuity of the ISALs Caritas Zimbabwe trains Community Based Facilitators
who will carry the monitoring of groups after graduation as well train more
groups. The training of the Community Based Facilitators is done in 7 days. While
the MWAGCD records that 90 groups have been trained by Caritas, it claims that
it has managed to train around 150 groups. This might be indicative that there
is need network regularly to update information between the partner
organization and the Ministry. It emerged from the interview that the organization
does not give regular reports to the Ministry of Women Affairs, Gender and
Community Development (Mr. Ndhlovu 2014, interview, 1/9/2014).
World
Vision
World Vision began operating in
Zimbabwe in 1973, providing assistance to children’s homes and offering relief
to Zimbabweans in campus and institutions. After independence in 1980, focus changed
to rehabilitation and small-scale development programmes as the country absorbed
exiles and displaced groups. Currently World Vision is addressing community
development focusing on children (www.wvi.org/Zimbabwe ).
World Vision incorporated ISALs
into a programme aimed at tackling barriers to girl child access to education
called Improving Girls Access Through
Transforming Education (IGATE). The programme is implemented in partnership
with Care International which has been selected for its expertise in ISALs and
SNV Netherlands Development on the other hand, is responsible for training
School Development Committees (SDCs). The VSL program or ISAL model is
incorporated to address financial barriers to girl’s education. The model educates
self selected households to save towards food, health and education. Mother
Support groups are formed within the VSL model to use the proceeds to meet the
school needs of the children such uniforms and school fees.(www.educationinnovations.org).
According to the World Vision
database there are 1628 ISAL members spread out in 233 supervised by 3 officers.
None of their trained groups have graduated. Trainings were conducted late in
2013.
Concern
Worldwide
Concern Worldwide started working
in Zimbabwe from 2002-2013 with the aim of increasing productivity by using
conservation farming techniques. Training of ISALs were done under Food Income
and Markets programme which was aimed at fighting famine at household level and
producing a surplus for sell. The organization was operating in Gokwe South,
Gokwe North and Nyanga. Concern Worldwide had targeted the training of 6211
ISALs but it managed to surpass the figures and it trained 6462 thus 1674 males
and 4788 females spread in 901 groups (Concern Worldwide Stakeholders Report
July 2012). A total of 40 Community Based Trainers were trained to train new
groups and monitor the activities of groups. MWAGCD does not have the database
Concern had (Community Development Officer, Interview 2/2/14).
Conclusion
This chapter looked at a brief
background of microfinance in Zimbabwe. It examined interventions of SACCOS,
ROSCAs and MFIs looking at their characteristics, successes and limitations
especially in the Zimbabwean context. The chapter went on to look at ISALs training
methodology and current and former implementers of the programme in Gokwe South.
Chapter 4 : The
Socio- Economic Characteristics of ISAL members
Membership
of ISALs
Most ISALs in Gokwe South are run
by females. Out of a total of 8778 member including the membership that were
trained by Concern which is not covered in MWAGCD database only 2624 are males
and the remaining 6154 are females. The reasons for the overwhelming numbers of
women participation lie in the fact that the programme was designed to empower
women so that they could increase their household income (Interview Ndlovu,
2014).
Membership
according to Wards
References
Primary
Sources
Concern Worldwide Gokwe Stakeholders’ District
Report July 2012
Ministry of finance, (1998)
Budget Millennium: Budget estimates: for the year ending December 1999,
Harare, Government Printers.
Ministry of finance, (1999)
Budget Millennium: Budget estimates: for the year ending December 1999,
Harare, Government Printers.
Ministry
of Women Affairs, Gender and Community Development Gokwe South ISAL database.
UNDP/UNCTAD (1996) Country
(Zimbabwe) Assessment Report
Zimbabwe
Democracy and Economic Recovery Act of 2001 Public Law 107–99—Dec. 21, 2001
Secondary Sources
2005
World Summit Millennium Development Goals
Allen,
H. (2002) ‘CARE International’s Village
Savings & Loan Programmes in Africa: Micro Finance for the Rural Poor that
Works’ in Care report.
Anyango, E. etal (2007) ‘Village Savings and
Loan Associations: experience from Zanzibar’ in Small Enterprise
Development .18 (1).
Asen,
R.(2002) Visions of Poverty: Welfare Policy and Political Imagination,
East Lansing, Michigan State University Press.
Biljlmakers , L.
A . Bassett M. T and Sanders, D. M (1996) Health and Structural Adjustment
in Rural and Urban Zimbabwe, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet , Motala.
Biljlmakers, L. A. Bassett M. T and Sanders, D. M (1998) Socioeconomic
Stress, Health and Child Nutritional Status in Zimbabwe at a Time of Economic
Structural Adjustment: A
three-year longitudinal study, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet , Motala.
Bradshaw, T. K. (2006) ‘Theories
of Poverty and Anti-Poverty Programs in Community Development’, in RPRC
Working Paper, No. 06-05, February.
Brannen , C.
(2010) ‘An Impact Study of the Village Savings and Loan Association (VSLA)
Program in Zanzibar, Tanzania’ in Honours Dissertation ,University of Weslyan.
Chigara, P. and Mutesasira, L. ‘Use and
Impact of Savings Services among Poor People in Zimbabwe: What
It Means for Microfinance Institutions’ in Microsave, 2001.
Chinake,
H. (1997) ‘Strategies for Poverty Alleviation in Zimbabwe’ in Journal of Social
Development, 12 ( 1).
Chuma, M. etal
(2013) ‘Survival Model’- Internal
Savings and Lending Schemes as a Livelihood Strategy for Female-Headed
Households in an Urban Context: The Case of Mucheke Suburb in Masvingo
City,Zimbabwe’ in Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 2
(2).
Chowdhury , A.(2009) ‘Microfinance as a
Poverty Reduction Tool—A Critical Assessment’ in DESA Working Paper , No. 89.
Enerst and Young (2006), ‘Reserve Bank of
Bank of Zimbabwe : National Microfinance Survey and proposed Legal and
Regulatory Framework’ Ernst and Young
report.
Hamadziripi, A. (2008) ‘Village
Savings and Loans Associations in Niger: Mata Masu Dubara Model of Remote
Outreach’ in Coady International Institute, June.
Hiatt, S .R. and Woodworth, W. P.
(2006: 471 ) ‘Alleviating poverty through microfinance: Village banking outcomes
in Central America’ in The Social Science Journal, 43 (2006).
Hulme,
D. (2000) ‘Impact Assessment Methodologies for Microfinance: Theory, Experience
and Better Practice,’ in World Development, 28(1).
Human
Rights and Poverty Reduction, (2004) A Conceptual Framework, New York
And Geneva, United Nations.
Katabarwa , C.
F. (2009) ‘Community based savings micro
finance and household income poverty eradication in Uganda: a case study of
Busimbi sub county, Mubende district.’,MA thesis, Makerere University.
Kinsey, B. H. Poverty Dynamics in Rural Zimbabwe: The 30 Years (Lost) ‘War against
Poverty’ in Paper prepared for the conference: Ten Years of ‘War
against Poverty’:What Have We Learned since 2000 and What Should We Do
2010-2020?, Chronic Poverty Research Centre and the Brooks World Poverty
Institute ,The University of Manchester, 8-10 September 2010.
Kyaw,
D. (2009) ‘Rural Households Food Insecurity Status and coping Strategies to
food insecurity in Myanmar’ in VRF series , No 444, Feb.
Leticia, A . A. (2012) ‘Micro
finance a means to poverty alleviation: a case of Masara n‘ariziki farmers
association’ in MA thesis of the Institute Of Distance Learning, Kwame
Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.
Mano,
R. & Matshe, I. (2006) Impact of HIV & AIDS on agriculture and food
security from Zimbabwe: Empirical Analysis of Two Districts in Zimbabwe,
Harare, University of Zimbabwe.
Manjengwa,
J. etal (2012) ‘Understanding poverty
in Zimbabwe: A sample survey in 16 Districts’, Paper prepared for presentation at the Centre for the Study of African
Economies Conference 2012 “Economic Development in Africa”, Oxford, United
Kingdom, March 18-20, 2012.
Matunhu,
J. and Mago, S. (2013) ‘Rural Banking for Rural Development in Zimbabwe’ in Stud
Tribes Tribals, 11 (1).
Mbizi R. and Gwangwava, E. (2013)
‘Rotating savings and credit
associations: an alternative funding for sustainable micro enterprise- case of
Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe’ in Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa,
15(7).
Ministry of finance, (1998) Budget
Millennium: Budget estimates: for the year ending December 1999, Harare,
Government Printers.
Ministry of finance, (1999)
Budget Millennium: Budget estimates: for the year ending December 1999,
Harare, Government Printers.
Ministry
of Women Affairs, Gender and Community Development Gokwe South ISAL database.
Mpofu , S. etal (2013) ‘Evaluation of the effectiveness of Zimbabwean
micro-finance institutions in promoting entrepreneurs in Bulawayo: post
dollarisation’ in Global Journal for Commerce and Management Perspective,
Vol 2 ,No 5.
Musarurwa ,C. and Lunga , W. (2012), ‘Climate change
mitigation and adaptation; threats and
Challenges to livelihoods in Zimbabwe’ in Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, Vol 1, No 2.
Mutambanadzo, T. (etal. 2013) ‘An analysis challenges faced by Zimbabwean
micro finance institutions in providing financial services to the poor and
informal sector in the dollarised regime’
in Global Journal for Commerce and Management Perspective, Vol 2
,No 3.
Mwalughali O. F.G.(2013) ‘The impact of
Community Savings and Investment promotion
program on household income and credit market participation in Kasungu
district’, Central Malawi,MA thesis,University of Malawi.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights, (2012) Principles and guidelines for a human rights approach
to poverty reduction strategies, Geneva.
Owusu, K. & Ng'ambi, F. (2002), Structural
damage: The causes and consequences of Malawi’s food crisis, World Development
29 October.
Page, B. I.
& Simmons, J. (2000) What Government Can Do: Dealing With Poverty and
Inequality, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Peachey, S. and
Roe, A. (2006) ‘Access to finance –What
does it mean and how do savings banks: foster access: a study for the
world savings banks institute (wsbi)’ in Perspective paper, World
Savings Bank Institute, Jan.
Rambo, C.
M. (2012) ‘Economic Empowerment of
Women through Village Savings and Loan Schemes: A Case of Care Kenya Program in
Rachuonyo,’ in DBA Africa Management Review. 2 (2).
Rasmussen,
O. D, (2013 ) ‘The economics of savings and loans association : evidence from a
randomized control trial in Malawi’, PHD thesis, University of Southern
Denmark.
Ryan,
W. (1976) Blaming the Victim, New York, Vintage.
Qureshi, M. I,
Saleem M. A. and Ali, M. I. (2012
)‘A conceptual framework: role & impact relationship between micro finance
and poor’s access :A case study of D.I.Khan District Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Pakistan’ in Interdisciplinary
Journal of contemporary in Research in business ,3(10).
Raftopoulos, B. and Lacoste, J.P. (2001) ‘Savings
Mobilisation to Micro-Finance:A Historical Perspective on the Zimbabwe Savings
Development Movement’, Paper presented at the International Conference
on“Livelihood, Savings and Debts in a Changing World: Developing Sociological
and Anthropological Perspectives, Wageningen,
The Netherlands.
Qureshi,
I .M. etal. (2012) ‘A conceptual framework: role & impact relationship
between micro finance and poor’s access: A case study of D.I. Khan District
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan’ in Interdisciplinary Journal of contemporary
research in business,Vol 3, No 10.
Schreiner M. and
Colombet, H.H. (2001)“From Urban to Rural: Lessons for Microfinance from
Argentina”,in Development Policy Review, 19, ( 3).
Sen,
A. (1999) Development As Freedom , New York, Anchor.
Sen,
A. (1982) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford,
Oxford Press.
Swamy, V. and Tulasimala, B.K
(2013) ‘Does microfinance impact on
food security and living standard of the poor?’ in Journal of
Business and Economic Management ,1(5), August.
The Poverty Reduction Forum Trust
(2013), ‘Study on Rural Poverty in Manicaland: The Case of Mutare Rural’, PRFT
Report.
UNDP/UNCTAD (1996)
Country (Zimbabwe) Assessment Report
Valentine
,C.A. ( 1968) Culture and Poverty ,Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Zimstat
(2013), Poverty and Poverty Datum Line Analysis in Zimbabwe 2011/12, Zimstat.
Zimstat
(2013), Poverty Income Consumption and Expenditure Survey 2011/12 Report,
Zimstat.
Internet
FAO, ‘The impact
of HIV/AIDS on the agricultural sector’ , www.fao.org/.../463605.htm
Accessed on 10/08/14
UNDP,
‘Fast Facts ‘ www.undp.org/... poverty-reduction/ Assessed 15 July 2014
Pham, T. and
Lensink, R. ‘Is microfinance an important instrument for poverty
alleviation?The impact of microcredit programs on self-employment
profits in Vietnam’in Department of Finance, Faculty
of Economics and Business, www.pegnet.ifw-/kiel.de/event/.
Accessed 2/7/14.
access
on 2/7/14
www.dochas.ie/share/files/2/
accessed 2/7/14
Jennings, R. ‘Participatory Development as New Paradigm:
The Transition of Development Professionalism’ www.pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnacq066.pdf.
Accessed 8/7/14
[1]
Cristóvão and Koehnen etal (2012), ‘Developing and delivering extension
programmes’ www.fao.org/docrep/w5830e/w5830e09.html,
accessed 08/07/14
Khan M. and Lightfoot , G. ‘ROSCAs: Alternative
Funding for Sustainable Enterprise’
http://www.uclan.ac.uk/lbs/research/research_institutes/files/ROSCAs_Alternative_Funding_for_Sustainable_Enterprise.pdf
,accessed 6/7/14.
Handley, etal
(2009), ‘Poverty and Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa:An Overview of Key
Issues’ in Overseas Development Institute Online Working papers 299 , London,
Westminister Bridge.
RBZ, ‘Impact of Sanctions on
Zimbabwe’ www.rbz.co.zw/farm_mech?sanctions.pdf Assessed 10/08/14
Tibaijuka AK
2005. Report of the Fact Finding Mission to Zimbabwe to Assess the Scope and
Impact of Operation Murambatsvina by the UN Special Envoy on Humanitarian
Settlement Issues in Zimbabwe. New York. UN, http://ww2.unhabitat.org/documents/Zimbabwe,
Accessed 08 /08/14
www.caritas.org , Accessed on 31 August 2014
www.wvi.org/Zimbabwe, Accessed on 31
August 2014
QUESTIONAIRE 1 ISAL MEMBERS
SECTION A: QUESTIONAIRE
IDENTIFICATION
1.
Date of Interview
|
|
District
|
|
Ward
|
|
Village
|
2. PERSONAL DETAILS
Name of Respondent
|
b)
Male
|
Female
|
|
SEX
|
||
c)
Age
|
(Tick were
appropriate)
|
15-24
|
|
24-29
|
|
30-49
|
|
50 and up
|
d)
Level of Education
|
(Tick were
appropriate
|
Primary
|
|
Secondary
|
|
Tertiary
|
|
Never Attended School
|
3. Household Information
Yes
|
No
|
|
Are you the Head of the Household ?
|
||
(If NO answer next question
/if YES skip next question)
b) Relationship
with head of Household?
c) Household size (Number of
family members)
1 – 3
|
|
4-6
|
|
6-9
|
|
More than 10
|
d)
Children Currently in School
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
Primary
|
||||||||||
Secondary
|
||||||||||
Tertiary
|
4. Income and Expenditure
a)
What is your occupation?
b) Main source of Income ?
c) Other Sources of Income:
1)
|
|
2)
|
|
3)
|
|
4)
|
|
5)
|
d) Amount earned per Year
Below $100
|
|
$300-$500
|
|
$500-$1000
|
|
$1000-1500
|
|
$1500-2000
|
|
$2000-more
|
e)
Expenditure
|
Amount
|
Household consumption (groceries)
|
|
Education
|
|
Clothing
|
|
Assets
|
|
Investments
|
|
Savings
|
|
Health
|
|
Agric inputs
|
f)
How often to you get money?
|
|||||||||
Daily
|
Weekly
|
Monthly
|
Yearly
|
Seasonally
|
5 Assets
a)
Type of Unit
|
(Tick where
appropriate)
|
Detached house
|
|
Semi -detached house
|
|
Flat
|
b)
Number of Dwelling Units /
c)
Roof
|
Wall
|
Floor
|
|||
Type of material used for construction of the roof.
(Tick were
appropriate)
|
Type of material used for construction of the wall
(Tick were
appropriate)
|
Type of material used construction of the floor
(Tick were
appropriate)
|
|||
Iron sheets
|
Burnt bricks with cement
|
Concrete
|
|||
Tiles
|
Cement blocks
|
Bricks
|
|||
Asbestors
|
Stone with cement
|
Cement screed
|
|||
Concrete
|
Un-burnt bricks with cement
|
Rammed earth
|
|||
Tins
|
Un-burnt Bricks with mud
|
Wood
|
|||
Thatching
|
Wood
|
||||
Mud and Pole
|
|||||
Other (Specify )
……………………………
|
Others (Specify)
…………………………
|
d) Fuel
Fuel/Power
|
Drinking Water
|
Distance from water source (Kms)
|
Time Taken To The Water Source
|
||||||||
What fuel does this
household mainly use for Lighting
|
What fuel does this
household mainly use for cooking
|
What is the households main
source of water for Drinking
|
Drinking water
|
Nearest water
|
|||||||
Electricity
|
Electricity
|
Tap/Piped water
|
|||||||||
Paraffin
|
Firewood
|
Borehole
|
|||||||||
Candles
|
Paraffin
|
Protected well
|
|||||||||
Firewood
|
Charcoal
|
Open water
source(unprotected well)
|
|||||||||
Solar
|
River
|
||||||||||
Batteries
|
|||||||||||
Generator
|
|||||||||||
Other specify
…………………………
|
Other Specify
……………………….
|
Other Specify
……………………….
|
|||||||||
e)
Does the Household Own
|
(Tick were
appropriate)
|
|||||
Transport
|
Communication
|
Other Assets
|
||||
Bicycle
|
Mobile phone
|
Generator
|
||||
Car
|
Radio
|
Scotch Cart
|
||||
Donkey
|
Television
|
Solar Panels
|
||||
Cows
|
||||||
f)
Draught power used for farming?
|
Own
|
Rented
|
Leased
|
Other
|
|
Cows
|
|||||
Donkeys
|
|||||
Man power
|
(Tick were appropriate)
Number of Cattle and Donkeys
owned by the household ………………………..
g)
Livestocks owned by the household?
|
(Tick were
appropriate)
|
Poultry (chickens , Ducks,
Turkeys, Guinea Fowl) etc
|
|
Goats
|
|
Pigs
|
|
Sheep
|
|
Rabbits
|
|
Fish
|
|
Other Specify :
|
6) Diet
a)
Meals
per day
1
|
2
|
3
|
More
|
|
Number of Meals Per day ?
|
||||
b)
Regular Dish
Sadza
|
Chicken
|
||||
Rice
|
Beef
|
||||
Rapoko
|
Goat Meat
|
||||
Millet
|
Green vegetables
|
||||
Potatoes
|
Other Specify
|
||||
Sorghum
|
|||||
Pasta
|
|||||
Other Specify
|
7) Financial Deatils
a)
Do you
have a Bank Account ?
|
Yes
|
No
|
b)
Type of Bank Account
|
|
Savings
|
|
Current
|
|
Fixed
|
|
Cooperate
|
c)
Where do you get your Loans ?
Bank
|
|
MFI
|
|
ROSCAS
|
|
ISALS
|
|
NONE
|
8) ISAL DETAILS
a) What are the reasons you
have for joining ISALs
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
b)
How
long have you been an ISAL Member
c)
How
many cycles have you completed
d)
What
are the changes you observed since you joined ISALS
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
e) Are there any assets you
have bought using money from the ISALS (and Give Asset Value)
1) $
2) $
3) $
4) $
5) $
f) How do you spend the loans you get from
ISALs
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
g) How did you spend the money
you get at the end of the cycle?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
h) Where do you get funds to deal with Emergencies?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
i)
How does the
community view members of ISALS?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
j) Has your status in the
Community Changed since you joined ISALS?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
k) What are the challenges you
have encountered because of ISALS?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Cross Sectional Questionnaire of Impact
Assessment (Group Questionnaire)
Date of data
collection ………………………………………………………
1. Name of group
|
|
2. Date of first training
meeting
|
|
3. Which organization
trained you?
|
|
4.Date Group started saving
|
|
5.Members at start of cycle
|
|
6.Active members at time of
interview
|
|
7. Active men at time of
interview
|
|
8.Active women at time of interview
|
|
9.No of members attending
meeting
|
|
10. Dropouts since start of
cycle
|
|
11.Value of savings this
cycle
|
|
12.No.of loans outstanding
|
|
13.Value of loans
outstanding
|
|
14.Write-off since start of
cycle
|
|
15. Total loan fund
|
|
16.Cash in other funds
|
|
17.Property at start of
cycle
|
|
18.Property now
|
|
19.Debts of the Group
|
|
20.Value of loans
|
|
21.Value of ISAL savings
used to purchase Agri-inputs at time of visit e .g
|
|
22.Linkage to external
savings e.g banks
|
|
23.Linkage to external
credit e.g banks
|
|
24 Challenges faced by the
Group
|
|
Key Informant
Interviews (MWAGCD/CARITAS ZIMBABWE/WORLD VISION)
My name is Tapiwa M Gudza ,I am a
student at the Midlands State University (MSU) doing Masters in Development
Studies and I am carrying out of study on the impact of ISALs on poverty
reduction in Gokwe South. The research is motivated by the need to understand
whether ISALs provide avenues for the poor and the poorest to meet their basic
needs. Your organization has been chosen for the interview since you are
implementing an ISAL programme. It is important to note that your participation
in the interview is voluntary and that ethical considerations will be observed.
I thank you in advance for your participation.
Date of Interview …………………………..
Name of Informant:
Position :
Organisation:
Sex:
Questions
1) What are ISALs
2) Why did you chose ISALs
3) May you give an overview of the
operation of ISAL as you implement them.
4) What is the eligibility criteria
of people who want to join ISAls
5) What do you think are the reasons
for people to join ISAL
6) How many groups have you helped
establish in the last 5 years?
7) What do you want to achieve with
programme?
8) What has been the response of
communities to ISALs
9) What were the states of affairs
before the programme intervention?
10) Through the course of the
programme what have you observed
11) What services do you offer to
ISALs members?
12) What are the benefits of ISALs
per se on the poor you have noticed during your programming.
13) What have been the challenges of
implementing ISALs?
14) How do you ensure sustainability
of ISALs
NB:
Follow up questions maybe asked for clarification purposes.
Key Informant
Interview: (DR/ MR /PROF HUGH ALLEN)
I am a student at the MSU and I
am carrying out a study on the impact of ISALs on poverty reduction in Gokwe
South. The research is motivated by the need to understand whether ISALs
provide avenues for the poor and the poorest to meet their basic needs. You
have been chosen for the interview since you are an expert in ISALs. It is
important to note that your participation in the interview is voluntary and
that ethical considerations will be observed. I thank you in advance for your
participation.
Date of Interview …………………………..
Name of Informant:
Position:
Organisation:
Sex:
Questions
1) What are ISALs /VSL and how do
they operate?
2) Why has your organisation chosen
ISALs /VSL?
3) What is the eligibility criteria
of people who want to join ISALs?
4) What do you think are the reasons
for people to join ISAL?
5) What do you want to achieve with
the programme?
6) What has been the response of
communities to ISALs?
7) What were the states of affairs
before the programme intervention?
8) What do you think are some of the services which
need to be made for ISALs members?
9) What are the benefits of ISALs
per se on the poor
10) What do you think is the impact
of ISALs on poverty reduction?
11) What are some of the challenges
you observed in implementation of ISALs in Zimbabwe?
12) How sustainable are ISALs and
what mechanisms do you recommend in ensuring their sustainability?
NB:
Follow up questions maybe asked for clarification purposes. THANK YOU
Electronic Key
Informant Interviews (Erstwhile Programme Manager Concern Gokwe South)
I am a student at the MSU and I
am carrying out a study on the impact of ISALs on poverty reduction in Gokwe
South. The research is motivated by the need to understand whether ISALs
provide avenues for the poor and the poorest to meet their basic needs. You
have been chosen for the interview since you are an expert in ISALs as well as
the former Programme Manager Concern
Gokwe South. It is important to note that your participation in the
interview is voluntary and that ethical considerations will be observed. I
thank you in advance for your participation.
Date of Interview …………………………..
Name of Informant:
Position :
Organisation:
Sex:
Place of Interview:
1) May you give a background of the
ISAL programme during the operation of Concern in Zimbabwe (Gokwe South).
2) How did you implement the ISALs
3) What was the status quo prior the
implementation of the programme?
4) How many groups did you help
establish?
5) What do you think you achieved
with the ISAL programme?
6) What was the response of the communities
to ISALs
7) What are the benefits of ISALs
per se on the poor you have noticed during your programming.
8) What were some of the lessons
learned from the ISAL programme?
9) What have been the challenges of
implementing ISALs?
10) How did you ensure the continuity
of ISALs?
THANK YOU
Electronic Key Informant Interviews (Erstwhile Concern Country
Director)
I am a student at the MSU and I
am carrying out a study on the impact of ISALs on poverty reduction in Gokwe
South. The research is motivated by the need to understand whether ISALs
provide avenues for the poor and the poorest to meet their basic needs. You
have been chosen for the interview since you are an expert in ISALs as well as
the former Country Director of Concern worldwide. It is important to note that
your participation in the interview is voluntary and that ethical
considerations will be observed. I thank you in advance for your participation.
Date of Interview …………………………..
Name of Informant:
Position :
Organisation:
Sex:
Place of Interview:
Questions
1) May you give a background of the
ISAL programme during the operation of Concern in Zimbabwe (Gokwe South).
2) How did you implement the ISALs
3) What was the status quo prior the
implementation of the programme?
4) How many groups have you helped
establish?
5) What do you think you achieved
with the ISAL programme?
6) What has been the response of
communities to ISALs
7) What were some of the lessons
learned from the ISAL programme?
8) What are the benefits of ISALs
per se on the poor you have noticed during your programming.
9) What have been the challenges of
implementing ISALs?
10) How did you ensure the continuity
of ISALs?
11) NB:
Follow up questions maybe asked for clarification purposes.
THANK YOU
[1] 2005 World
Summit Millennium Development Goals
[2] Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Principles and guidelines for a human rights
approach to poverty reduction strategies, Geneva, 2012, p. 2.
[3] Ibid, p . 2.
[4] Human Rights and
Poverty Reduction. A Conceptual Framework(New York And Geneva ,United
Nations ,2004)
[5] Office of the United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights, Principles and guidelines for a human
rights approach to poverty reduction strategies , Geneva , 2012, p. 4.
[6] A. Sen, Development
As Freedom, Anchor , New York, 1999, p
Valentine
, C.A Culture and Poverty Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1968, p.
[7]
www.maplandia.com/Zimbabwe/Midlands/gokwe/gokwe/
)assessed 2/08/14
[9]
G. Mazarire and M. Rupiya, “Two wrongs
not a right: A Critical Assessment of Zimbabwe’s Demobilisation and
Reintegration Programmes 1980-2000” (unpublished manuscript), p.9.
[10]
Ministry of finance, Budget Millennium: Budget estimates: for the year
ending December 2000, Harare, Government Printer, 1999,p.10.
[11]N.B
The first endnote represent the first figure and the second the next
figure.
Ministry of
finance, Budget Millennium: Budget estimates: for the year ending December
2001, Government Printer, Harare, 1999, p.10.
Ministry of finance, Budget Millennium: Budget
estimates: for the year ending December 2001, Government Printer, Harare, 1999,p.10.
[12]
Staff reporter, “Harare's War Chest Gobbles Up $16.2
Billion”, in The Financial Gazette, February 14, 2002,p. 1.
[13] M. Khan and
G. Lightfoot , ‘ROSCAs: Alternative Funding for Sustainable Enterprise’ http://www.uclan.ac.uk/lbs/research/research_institutes/files/ROSCAs_Alternative_Funding_for_Sustainable_Enterprise.pdf ,accessed
6/7/14.
[14] R. Mbizi and E.
Gwangwava, ‘Rotating savings and credit
associations: an alternative funding for sustainable micro enterprise- case of
Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe’ in Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa
,Volume 15, No.7, 2013 , p. 186.
[15] C. F Kabatarwa,
‘Community based savings micro finance
and household income poverty eradication in Uganda: a case study of Busimbi Sub
County, Mubende District’, MA thesis, Makerere University,2009,p.14.
[16] R. Mbizi and E.
Gwangwava, ‘Rotating
savings and credit associations: an alternative funding for sustainable micro
enterprise- case of Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe’ in Journal of Sustainable
Development in Africa ,Volume 15, No.7, 2013 , p. 187.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.