Projects
play a vital role in management of development. Projects provide principal
means which can change our world through providing immediate solutions to
problems. Projects also gauge the success or failure of any programme as well
as act as a rational way of allocating resources and also facilitate tangible
results .Projects can also allow development agencies to focus resources and
attention or effort on well defined sets of activities in order to achieve
specific objectives being on specific location. Grittinger (2001) note that
projects are cutting age of development .However projects can only be useful to
further development if they are implemented correctly and being the rightful solution
to a problem .The gist of this paper is to analyse the role of projects and see
if they deliver the goals as in given examples as well analysing why some
projects fail to deliver the required outcomes as the vital part of projects.
According
to John Clark (1991) projects are temporary organisational units to identify
long term improvements by temporary efforts, based on a high degree of freedom.
Hirschman alluded that a project is a specified kind of investment which
connotes purposefulness, some minimum size, specific location, introducing
something qualitatively new and the expectation that the sequence of further
development moves will set in motion. Akroyd (2003) describes a project as a
discrete or independent package of investment designed to remove or alleviate
low development contraits or development opportunities. UNDP(2004)define a
project as a temporary and ever undertaken to create a unique product or
service .A project has a definite end and must have unique features and
non-repeated. Projects also differ in size, duration, geographical coverage as
well as in complexity .A project can form a programme.
Projects are also a rational way of allocating
resources. World Bank (2004) recognizes the link between poverty and lack of
social organization and empowerment (social capital), participation and voice
(political capital) and environmental degradation (natural capital) and it is
trying to address these issues through its financing activities. Participation
of poor people at all stages of the project cycle is one major concern of the
organisation, which uses special tools, such as the Participatory Poverty
Assessments and the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, to ensure participation
of the poor in decision making which is vital to development. However if the
participation of the poor in such projects
is not done the project will be in vain or it will benefit the wrong
people thereby reducing the purpose of a project as a rational way of
allocating resources.
Projects
allow agencies to focus resources and attention or effort on well defined sets
of activities in order to achieve specific objectives being on a specific
location. For example World Bank (2004) has also adopted another intriguing
initiative called “Justice for the Poor”, which is funded by the Australian
Government (AusAID) with the collaboration of other donors. This program seeks
to provide both Bank project teams and client countries with support to address
justice issues in development projects. It is housed in the Legal VPU which
provides advisory services and disseminates knowledge through publications, a
website and training courses for Bank staff. This initiative particularly
focuses on the marginalized and the poor aiming at promoting access to justice
and protecting their rights. This nature of projects is also transforming societies
into human rights development thereby became more valuable in the management of
development.
Further, projects also provide immediate
solutions to problems. For example World Vision is committed to enhancing
access by the poor, especially women, to productive assets such as properties
and credit; supporting commercialization of agriculture in a way that will
benefit the poor; developing rural infrastructure; assisting in generating
employment and fighting seasonal poverty and to encourage the participation of
the poor in designing programs and projects that will benefit them. It is also
committed to supporting educational, health and nutritional projects for poor
and vulnerable people (Chambers 1994). By doing this a project can be said that
it is eliminating poverty and provide immediate solution hence playing a vital
role in management of development. However such projects may be affected by
corruption and diversion of funds which may reduce the role of projects. Proper
monitoring and implementation may facilitate the success of projects to deliver
their role in the management of development.
If one project is successful it gains external
attention and increases expectations which are necessary in processes of
development. Other projects are, then, more likely to be introduced, what makes
the social network grow. In that way the technology is being tested in
different environments and scales, lessons learned by the trial and error
technique enhance the technology, what makes the expectations grow again
(Lusting 2000). For example irrigation projects in Masvingo province
specifically Mushandike and Bhuka contribute to expansion of irrigations in the
province and people are benefiting much .The project is also contributing more
to the development of Zimbabwe through irrigation schemes which are giving incomes
to people and also supplement household food. This type of project also acts as
a measure of development to different countries.
Projects
facilitate tangible results which are a good measure of managing the processes
of development and provide clear picture for planners and policy makers. This
can be witnessed in Kenya where World Bank conducted a project of renewable
energy which produces vital tangible results to the villagers. Small scale
renewable energy projects in Kenya greatly improve the quality of life of the
local population. Lighting alone creates benefits such as increased study time,
extended hours for small businesses, and greater security (World Bank 2003, Foster
2000). Also in sector of health there was introduction of cleaner energy,
income generating activities are in the form of jobs and stimulation of entrepreneurship
that lead to poverty reduction, savings were made through the introduction of
more efficient energy sources, and the daily productivity increased by
extending working hours beyond daylight time and by lowering the time spend on
collection of traditional fuels such as firewood. Indirectly, spinoffs such as
for instance increased knowledge enhanced local development as well.
Projects
can also gauge the success and failure of a programme or policy, for example
the case of the Solar Entrepreneur project on Madagaskar, a cheaper source of
lighting is offered to the poor. The baseline analysis shows that the lamps are
rented out against the same price of a candle. Therefore, this does
unfortunately not decrease the costs for lighting for a household, and thus it
cannot contribute to reduction of extreme poverty in that manner(Valadez and
Bamberge 2000). In this case failure of the project provides a gauge which
calls for another measure to be implemented in order to enhance development.
More
so projects are also a means of channelling resources to specific beneficiaries
for example income distribution. World Vision and Care International supports
indigenous women because it realizes the great untapped capacity for
sustainable development intrinsic in indigenous spirituality and cosmogony. Indigenous
women have a significant potential role as ‘stewards’ of national and global
natural resources and biodiversity. Indigenous women are also repositories of
varied and locally rooted knowledge systems that make an important contribution
to the world’s heritage. They are also rich in cultural diversity, a valuable
quality. Significantly, indigenous women have a key role to play in peace
brokering and
conflict
mitigation (Rogers etal 2001). By supporting
women such projects are a means of channelling resources as well as empowering
women which is a vital step in management of development. However in most
developing countries such women projects are also used to manipulate women and
to gain political support rather than benefiting them hence reducing the role
of projects towards development.
Another great example of project used as
income distribution is in Madagaskar were the twin objectives of that project
is raising the incomes of indigenous families in the hills (such as Tamang,
Danuwar, Praja, Magar and Majhi) who live below the poverty line and
contributing to improving the ecology of the hills – were achieved by granting
blocks of degraded forest to groups of poor households through a 40 year-lease
agreement. Through the training programme, most women have acquired basic
literacy skills, and the group members are much more aware of their legal
rights and the importance of education and adequate health, sanitation and
nutrition for themselves and their families. With the acquisition of leasehold
land, many women have started cultivating mulberries and vegetables for sale.
The income generated by this activity is used for children’s school expenses,
medicine, food, clothing and group savings (Riely etal 1995). This indicates
that projects can help in income distribution and resources which is vital for
development.
Projects
are also a means or instrument through which policies, plans and programmes are
implemented. (Rodrick 2001).For example the Women Empowerment Policy of
Zimbabwe was implemented through projects such as Small to medium scale
business enterprises where woman were funded to start businesses. The successfulness
of such projects were not clearly seen since the projects were highly
politicised which hinder projects to act as a measure of development. Also the
Youth Empowerment Policy of Zimbabwe was implemented through government loans
to youth. This act also failed to materialise due to lack of supervision and
politics. However, projects if correctly implemented they can lead to
implementation of good policies and programmes which are vital for management
of development.
Projects
are policy expedience, way of experimenting a policy. For example South Africa
Black Empowerment Policy comes with a variety of projects for black people to
participate in the economy of South Africa. Projects include loans for business
start up and portions of land to develop but this was not fruitful since the
benefiters showed less interest therefore led to the formation of another policy.
In this case projects tested the successfulness of the policy as well as
experimented the policy.(World Bank 2003)
However,
projects can be used in building political capital. More recently, projects
have become part of the debate on donor harmonization, alignment, and use of
country systems in project implementation. A paper released in October 2004 by
UNDP states that the isolation of projects from government systems as required
by external funding agencies limits the positive impact of development
assistance to the individual projects.(World development report 2004) In such a
scenario projects can also create dependency syndrome which is not clear to
measure the rate of development. Some projects are also used to manipulate
people by political parties which give no room for such projects to be useful
in management of development.
Projects
are also privileged particles of development. They play a great role as figures
of development. (World Bank 2003) For instance construction of bridges and
roads are just particles of development. For example CBZ and FBC banks are
building houses for people for mortgages. Such types of projects are particles
of development which can also be used as a measure of development in any
country.
Also
projects can be used to speed up the rate of development processes through
speeding up the processes of development .For example projects must seen as
means to achieve larger ends. South Africa is now the number one leading nation
in development and this was facilitated through projects like dams, bridges,
roads construction as well as construction of infrastructure. These projects
promote not only economic development but political and social development. In
Malawi the government engaged in draining of swamps to clear land for
agriculture which speed up the Agricultural policy of 2004 as well as
contributing to its success.(world Development report 2004)
Projects
are also a way of mobilising development funds. For example irrigation schemes
can produce money for another development programmes .For example Gezira
irrigation scheme is benefiting the country by inducing 10 percent of its
profits to health sector in the country. Again projects like milling projects,
cattle fattening or any manufacturing project mobilise developments funds which
is vital in the management of development. (IFAD 2000)
Projects
also enable the target groups to gain the knowledge necessary to solve problems
as far as possible on their own / to get access to services. This can be
achieved through proper management and proper implementation of such projects (Riely
etal 1995). For example the Indigenisation policy of Zimbabwe was implemented
through projects of which most of them are not successful because of biased
implementation especially on political grounds on the funds which were given to
youth and women to start up projects.
Locally
adjusted solutions are identified and tested in cooperation with target groups
and co-operating agencies through projects .For example dam construction in
Zimbabwe offer income generation to people as well as paving way for road
construction which network the country .Though the project failed to deliver
the exact necessities of people, it manage to create a way of income and
indicate the rate of development Zimbabwe is going through.
People
(especially the poor) are in a position to make appropriate use of their
resources and to get access to required services through projects. Successfully
tested solutions are disseminated on all relevant subjects through projects (Rodrick
2001). However because of corruption and diversion of funds most projects are
half done and they are not very effective in most countries around the globe. Levels
and implementing agencies have the knowledge to implement the identified
solutions but reduced their participation due to political biases that some
areas are neglected because of political background which makes it hard to
measure the usefulness of projects.
Projects
can also deliver regular well established services if managed properly (Clay
1997). For example dam construction projects which was carried on in Zimbabwe
around 1990s was suppose to offer services to the people but the constructions
were half done with little supervision which failed to offer the targeted
services to the people hence becomes so difficult to use projects to measure
development or to establish services to the people.
An
intersectional co-ordinated programme system is established and functioning
through projects. (IFAD 2004) This indicates that projects give guidance and
direction to management of development in an area. Successfully implemented
projects like water projects by Action
firm in Zimbabwe (Gutu district) is
giving guidance to their goal of WASH .This implies that small projects are
being used to achieve a goal and offer management of development as a goal.
For
projects to be fruitful there should be proper monitoring and implementation. Projects
must also be vital for a planned purpose and must save a purpose as well as
offer guidance and solutions to a problem. However projects need to be a way of
creating a road for development as well as a necessity which can be measured in
the management of development.
In conclusion projects play a vital role in
the management of development. Projects are a way of channelling resources to
the people, they can also be used to raise funds for development as well as
offer guidance in management of development among others .To a greater extent
projects are necessary in the management of development if they are well
coordinated.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Administrative
Committee on Coordination Sub-Committee on Nutrition. 1993
BAOBAB: Handbook on
Development Design- Roles of projects.
Clark John, Democratizing development, the
role of voluntary organisations,London, Earthscan,1991.
Chambers,
R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal, Oxford ,Oxford
university,1994
Clay, E.. Food security: A status review of
the literature. Research Report
ESCOR
No. R5911. London: 1997.
Determinants of Household Food Security in
Honduras. A report on the National Household International Fund for
Agricultural Development (IFAD). 1998.
Food
composition table. The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University,
Department of Human Nutrition. Development Administration Report 2007
Hills
Leasehold Forestry and Forage Development Project, Draft Evaluation Report,
IFAD 2003
Human
Stories of Rural Poor, IFAD 2000
Lustig N and N. Stern “Broadening the agenda
for poverty reduction: opportunity, empowerment, security”, IMF Finance and Development, 2000
Management
of Natural Resources in the Southern Highlands Project, External Evaluation
Report, IFAD,2008
Riely,
F., N. Mock, B. Cogill, L. Bailey, and E. Kenefick. Food security indicators
and framework for use in the monitoring and evaluation of food aid programs.
IMPACT: Food security and nutrition monitoring project, Arlington, Va., U.S.A.1995.
Rogers,
B. L., A. J. Swindale, and P. Ohri-Vachaspati,Roles of projects in implementing
programmes,New York. 1996.
Rodrik D, “Development strategies for the next
century” Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Third
Report on the World Nutrition Situation. Geneva:unicef 2009
United
Naitons ACC/SCNCTA/ECSA (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural
Cooperation/East,Central, and Southern Africa Food and Nutrition Cooperation).
1987. United Nations General Assembly
“Legal Empowerment of the poor and eradication of poverty” 2009.
Valadez,
J, and M. Bamberger. Monitoring and evaluating social programs in developing
countries. Washington, D.C.: World Bank 2000.
World
Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2004. Making Services Work for Poor
People. Washington, DC
.
World
Bank. 2004. Issues in the Use of Country Systems in Bank Operations.
Washington, DC.
World
Development Report
2000.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.